We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

cleggeron corporate tax cuts

245

Comments

  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 20 May 2010 at 8:00AM
    ninky wrote: »
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/businesslatestnews/7737913/George-Osborne-set-to-cut-headline-corporation-tax.html

    it seems 'fiscal stimulus' is okay for some but not for others.

    don't forget though...we're all in this together.
    i don't think this is a bad thing if it encourages business investment.

    the only bad thing is if it encourages larger profits that get's distributed to share holders that are not in the UK which i think this will. we'll have to wait and see...
  • bendix
    bendix Posts: 5,499 Forumite
    Ninky is famously anti-business. Media-employed middle class socialists usually are.

    Curiously though, they are also pro-working class which is kind of ironic, given that most of them have never met any except that nice chap they buy the Big Issue from outside Wholefoods Supermarket.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    In Ninkys world, money for public spending just appears out of nowhere, it does not have to actually be created.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    ILW wrote: »
    In Ninkys world, money for public spending just appears out of nowhere, it does not have to actually be created.
    bendix wrote: »
    Ninky is famously anti-business. Media-employed middle class socialists usually are.

    Curiously though, they are also pro-working class which is kind of ironic, given that most of them have never met any except that nice chap they buy the Big Issue from outside Wholefoods Supermarket.
    i'd stick to the corporation tax subject instead of focusing on Ninky...

    it comes across as you don't like what she's saying and don't have a real response to her argument...
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    chucky wrote: »
    i'd stick to the corporation tax subject instead of focusing on Ninky...

    it comes across as you don't like what she's saying and don't have a real response to her argument...

    Very true chucky...:T

    I was thinking about this last night. Kinda makes me laugh sometimes, especially with a lot of the slash the public sector now threads we get on here.

    With the tories in, each day it seems more & more like the private sector got us into this situation. It will be the public sector that bails us out.
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • vivatifosi
    vivatifosi Posts: 18,746 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Mortgage-free Glee! PPI Party Pooper
    lemonjelly wrote: »
    With the tories in, each day it seems more & more like the private sector got us into this situation. It will be the public sector that bails us out.

    That's not fair on the private sector though lj. I can see the point that banks got us into this, but even then you can't blame all banks, let alone the whole finance industry and certainly not all of the private sector.

    There are lots of businesses hurting in the UK and ILW's point is at the crux of this, you need private businesses for wealth creation.

    I think it was Pennywise who was talking recently about the lack of entrepreneurialism in the UK these days and it is a major problem. You need people to want to start small businesses and employ people because even huge businesses have to start somewhere and small business employ a lot of people. Unfortunately there are many surveys that show that entrepreneurialism is more of a state of mind and attitude, so we can't ask the public sector to teach it in school and everything will be ok, we have to have a favourable tax regime to coax those out with the balls to do it.
    Please stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    vivatifosi wrote: »
    That's not fair on the private sector though lj. I can see the point that banks got us into this, but even then you can't blame all banks, let alone the whole finance industry and certainly not all of the private sector.

    There are lots of businesses hurting in the UK and ILW's point is at the crux of this, you need private businesses for wealth creation.

    I think it was Pennywise who was talking recently about the lack of entrepreneurialism in the UK these days and it is a major problem. You need people to want to start small businesses and employ people because even huge businesses have to start somewhere and small business employ a lot of people. Unfortunately there are many surveys that show that entrepreneurialism is more of a state of mind and attitude, so we can't ask the public sector to teach it in school and everything will be ok, we have to have a favourable tax regime to coax those out with the balls to do it.

    I can see where you're coming from Viva. In a way, I suppose I'm kinda venting at some of the free marketeers on here.

    That said, I really do feel that the current situation was very much made by the private sector. Yes, not every private company/bank was culpable, but the sytems in the private sector created our situation by creating belief systems supported by ongoing unsustainable personal debt, poor management, consumer & profit driven greed, bad accounting & investments and poor quality products and services.

    We are not in this together anymore. Business will now pay even further reduced taxes. Workers will pay more in taxes. & the public sector will really bear the brunt of viscious cuts.

    If the private sector were an individual, I'd be wondering how he/she could look themselves in the mirror. Unfortunately, I'm wondering (from what I'm reading & seeing) is that they don't care.
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • chucky
    chucky Posts: 15,170 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    lemonjelly wrote: »
    Very true chucky...:T

    I was thinking about this last night. Kinda makes me laugh sometimes, especially with a lot of the slash the public sector now threads we get on here.

    With the tories in, each day it seems more & more like the private sector got us into this situation. It will be the public sector that bails us out.
    i'm not a fan of a bloated public sector but i read something the other day that 70p in the £1 of public sector take home pay get's spent in the local economy.

    i'd like to see if this is the case in the private sector. as salaries are higher here i can't see it being anywhere close to this.
  • lemonjelly
    lemonjelly Posts: 8,014 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Mortgage-free Glee!
    chucky wrote: »
    i'm not a fan of a bloated public sector but i read something the other day that 70p in the £1 of public sector take home pay get's spent in the local economy.

    i'd like to see if this is the case in the private sector. as salaries are higher here i can't see it being anywhere close to this.

    I abhor any kind of waste. Having worked for charities I know it is essential to make the best value from absolutely everything you have. EVERYTHING is an asset. So I agree, that where there is waste in a system we should be looking to cut/trim/streamline. After all, there are still big problems that need fixing, & that money could well be spent on good things that would significantly positively affect society.

    But I get the feeling now that the private sector seem to say "well we've done our bit, had a few redundancies...over to you". The tories are likely to be supportive of this.

    Be very interested to know where you read that.
    It's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    chucky wrote: »
    i'd stick to the corporation tax subject instead of focusing on Ninky...

    it comes across as you don't like what she's saying and don't have a real response to her argument...

    Bottom line.
    Without a profitable private sector, there is no public sector.
    Not the other way round.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.