We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Is this why prices will rise for a while yet?

Blacklight
Posts: 1,565 Forumite


Year: Index: No of Years: 1952-1967 100-200 15 1967-1972 200-400 5 1972-1978 400-800 6 1978-1984 800-1600 6 1984-1989 1600-3200 5 1989-2003 3200-6400 14From 2003 we saw a rise from 6400 to 9730 in 2007 (52%) in 4 years. At that rate house prices would have doubled by 2009 (in 6 years). Other things happened which prevented that trend and rises have stalled for the last 3 years.
Indications are that they will pick up dramatically in the near future. Two consecutive periods of very slow growth in 1989-2003 (14 years) and 2003-2010 (only 34% in 7 years) could mean a short sharp shock as prices now look well out of sync with the long term trend.
Discuss.
0
Comments
-
Blacklight wrote: »Discuss.
I'd like to see the link for the data.
However, simply taking a timeframe for growth is flawed as it doesn't take into account the number of things that drive house prices.
Certainly, it would appear that with an increasing population and not enough properties being built to support that population growth, that house prices would rise.
We do not know however, what the future could bring.
Any number of fundamentals could change.
We could set a negative net migration, we could see increase in properties built, we could see a change in culture to more like the east where three or four generations share the same property.:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
Blacklight wrote: »
Year: Index: No of Years: 1952-1967 100-200 15 1967-1972 200-400 5 1972-1978 400-800 6 1978-1984 800-1600 6 1984-1989 1600-3200 5 1989-2003 3200-6400 14
From 2003 we saw a rise from 6400 to 9730 in 2007 (52%) in 4 years. At that rate house prices would have doubled by 2009 (in 6 years). Other things happened which prevented that trend and rises have stalled for the last 3 years.
Indications are that they will pick up dramatically in the near future. Two consecutive periods of very slow growth in 1989-2003 (14 years) and 2003-2010 (only 34% in 7 years) could mean a short sharp shock as prices now look well out of sync with the long term trend.
Discuss.
Discuss history?
You learn lessons from history, not predict the future.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Discuss history?
You learn lessons from history, not predict the future.
What do these lessons teach you then?:wall:
What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
Some men you just can't reach.
:wall:0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »What do these lessons teach you then?
That history doesn't always repeat itselfThe only thing that is constant is change.0 -
zygurat789 wrote: »That history doesn't always repeat itself
.......... but it always rhymes."The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
Albert Einstein0 -
ive worked it out looking at the graphs and historical data, my calculations say houses will have gone up 50 pence by 2020.
And thats nationally.0 -
IveSeenTheLight wrote: »What do these lessons teach you then?
Only fools chase rainbows.0 -
If you counted 24 hours a day, it would take 31,688 years to reach one trillion!0
-
new_home_owner wrote: »If you counted 24 hours a day, it would take 31,688 years to reach one trillion!
Most people can't count past 10. - SUPERFACTNot Again0 -
1984ReturnsForReal wrote: »Most people can't count past 10. - SUPERFACT
Tenty one, tenty two etc0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards