We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Former Treasury chief secretary's message to his successor
Comments
-
-
The reason this thread splits two ways is not that one side has a sense of humour and the other doesn't.
It's that one "side" thinks that person A has made an absolute horlicks of the economy, knowingly, and then has chosen to make a joke about it to the person who is going to have to sort it out. Which isn't very funny.
The other side thinks person A has done what anyone in that situation typically does, possibly for better reasons, and then has shown themselves to be human about the impossibility of the situation; and anyhow it wasn't person A's fault. Which is pretty good English stoicism. I get that.
So it's just a matter of perspective; a bit like when you were a teenager and your best mate drank too much and barfed all over the house when your parents were out. Or when that bully from down the road came over, nicked all your booze, barfed and then laughed, leaving you to pick up the pieces.
The "it's like rape" point was just silly.
Oh, and I wasn't aware of the precedent, which does give it more legitimacy, I agree - a sort of "in joke", bit like the expenses saga, or silly poses of the Bullingdon club, or other examples of "fine from the inside, but still inexcusable from outside".0 -
Oh, and I wasn't aware of the precedent, which does give it more legitimacy, I agree - a sort of "in joke", bit like the expenses saga, or silly poses of the Bullingdon club, or other examples of "fine from the inside, but still inexcusable from outside".
Or maybe as Liam Byrne stated, it is common statement from him (and his predecessors) to other ministers when turning them down for extra cash, and simply banter in this context, I did find find David Laws appearing on tv with the contents of the note very cringy.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards