We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Subneting

2»

Comments

  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    tomsolomon wrote: »
    So a router would negate the need for switches and hubs could be used in their place?
    No. What you think of as a router is in fact a router with a hub on the back. It is the hub on the back of the router which might negate the need for a switch. But if you have 30 machines to think about, you need switches not hubs. Hubs don't know which machine is on which connection, so everything is echoed everywhere. But a switch knows which machine is on which port and only sends to the correct port. [It only knows the machines by MAC address, not by IP address.]
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • No. What you think of as a router is in fact a router with a hub on the back.
    No, it's actually a switch that is included with home routers.

    Another common mistake is to assume routers by definition perform NAT and firewalling.
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    No, it's actually a switch that is included with home routers.

    Another common mistake is to assume routers by definition perform NAT and firewalling.
    Hmm. I have never been convinced that it is a switch rather than a hub - there are so many home routers out there and you would need to examine each one in order to generalise, that I tend to think of them as hubs.

    I agree about NAT and firewalling. DHCP and time server also come into the same bracket of extra functions which are not central to a router.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 353.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455K Spending & Discounts
  • 246.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 602.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178K Life & Family
  • 260.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.