We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Con-Lib agreement on a £10k personal allowance for income tax?
Comments
-
10k tax threshold and george osbourne to be chancellor.
according to the bbc"The problem with quotes on the internet is that you never know whether they are genuine or not" -
Albert Einstein0 -
Tell him to grow a pair of balls and suck it up. First valuable lesson in life; ignore the Oiks, they wont be laughing when you go to study medicine when they are stacking shelves in Asda.
I do agree with whoever it was who said it's how you bring up the children. I was brought up with entirely hand-me down clothes, from a girl who was the daughter of a friend of my parents and who was about 4 years older than me and vastly fatter; she hewrself had got them as hand-me-downs from some cousins of hers in America. Thus by the time I got to actually wear anything it was a least about 7 years out of date, and doubly worn.
It didn't bother me in the slightest; I was not brought up spoiled or to expect new stuff, so I was perfectly happy. It wasn't until I was 12 and wore a pair of astonishingly flared jeans to go ice-skating with a friend that I realised 70's fashion might not be entirely appropriate in 1983.
With my kids, I cheerfully say no where any kind of brands are concerned, and point out how going for a cheap, unbranded version will mean mummy has to work less and we'll have more money to spend on other stuff we want, like toys, books or holidays. I teach them that people obsessed with brands and appearance are usually like that because of lack of self-confidence, and that we should pity them rather than try to be like them. I try to teach them that it is what is inside not on the outside that matters.
I'm pleased to say my DDs seem to have found friends with similar values.0 -
Carol is right, but somehow there is more to this.
I'd love it if the flashy 'want it now'/rack up the debts type people were able to see a different way of living a sorted life and think "hey, they seem to get by ok in no-brand trainers; and they get to have holidays too".
It'll never happen of course. If shops couldn't persuade every child that they really need the next iphone 9G, the next Nintendo Dsiii, the consumer economy would collapse.0 -
-
lemonjelly wrote: »See, the problem with any relativist arguement, is they are all self defeating.
Essentially you are saying "well it depends on your perspective..." Now, if you are saying this, you are effectively saying all perspectives are equally valid. Which means that the exact opposite of your arguement is as valid as the arguement you've put forward. Surely that can't be right. There has to be things which are true, & things which aren't...Doesn't there?
Do even you understand what you have said?The only thing that is constant is change.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards