We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
which shares to buy?
sheraz2
Posts: 1,637 Forumite
Can someone point me in the right direction of a one stop service of checking share prices and being able to do some reading up! :T
God made man, man made money, money made man mad
0
Comments
-
Check the boards at https://www.fool.co.uk for loads of info
For share info check out http://www.digitallook.com/0 -
Try the Motley Fool. Digitallook is very useful as well; Hemscott is excellent but some parts are subscription-only.0
-
don't do shares unless you know what you are doing - high risk
better of going for managed funds -unit trust, oeics or investment trusts{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature please contact the Forum Team}0 -
Paul_-C- wrote:I'd still suggest researching them. They aren't as scary as some people would like you to think.
Yes, but the MAJOR advantage of funds is that you can invest relatively little amounts of money, gain specific goals exposure (income and/or capital growth) and also assume less risk through DIVERSIFICATION! (and at little cost else you require a large portfolio of shares to diversify as much as funds do).
Also, managed funds can be used as part of passive investment strategies as the fund managers themselves make all of the decisions to buy and sell - so the less savvy investors don't have to be constantly worrying about the performance of their shares.
Another plus for funds is that most can be bought in PEPs and ISAs and you can therefore gain tax exemption from income (except 10% tax credit on UK dividends) and capital gains above your annual limit of £8,800.{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature please contact the Forum Team}0 -
The first two points apply equally to shares. As far as diversification is concerned, a portfolio of 15-20 shares is adequate to mitigate investment risk. Obviously if you want to diversify into assets like property and corporate bonds, funds or ETFs are probably a better choice.Yes, but the MAJOR advantage of funds is that you can invest relatively little amounts of money, gain specific goals exposure (income and/or capital growth) and also assume less risk through DIVERSIFICATION! (and at little cost else you require a large portfolio of shares to diversify as much as funds do).
The same goes for shares.Another plus for funds is that most can be bought in PEPs and ISAs and you can therefore gain tax exemption from income (except 10% tax credit on UK dividends) and capital gains above your annual limit of £8,800.0 -
If you have small amounts to invest you could use Halifax Sharebuilder to buy shares for £1.50 per transaction. This way you can build up a reasonable amount of shares to be well diversified. Also, with this approach you don't have fund managers taking a chunk of your money off you, even if the fund is making a loss.LOST wrote:Yes, but the MAJOR advantage of funds is that you can invest relatively little amounts of money, gain specific goals exposure (income and/or capital growth) and also assume less risk through DIVERSIFICATION! (and at little cost)
Also, some say that fund managers are unable to take big risks, due to pressure to make sure they meet their targets without jeopordising the capital. Therefore their purchases could be easily replicated by an investor who has done enough research, but without the annual fees.0 -
Fund managers do take annual commision charges regardless of performance - but I'm sure the rules are to change so that they are able to take performance related bonuses which were not available before.
Also, unit trusts and oeics have more strict guidelines in place for their ability to borrow upto only 10% of the value of the fund on a temporary basis (on known future cash inflows) whereas investment trusts can borrow upto 100% as is similar to indivual companies - thus the perceived risks are greatly reduced by the limitation on unit trusts and oeics' ability to gear!
Also, unless you have substantial funds and/or existing investments, sufficient diversification is only acheived via funds.
It all depends on individuals' perception of risk and how much risk they wish to be exposed to in order to see what they seem as viable investments.{Signature removed by Forum Team - if you are not sure why we have removed your signature please contact the Forum Team}0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.4K Spending & Discounts
- 245.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
