We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Seller in mortgage arrears

2»

Comments

  • BobProperty
    BobProperty Posts: 3,245 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    BarmyBubba wrote:
    .....
    His mortgage is with Northern Rock, he also has a loan with them......
    Isn't it Northern Rock who do the 125% LTV "mortgages" with part as a mortgage and part as an unsecured loan? This is a bit of a dilemma for them if the house doesn't cover the loans. They can sell or repossess at a loss or try and get the extra out of him first, neither of which I can see happening. I would be tempted to say that if you really want this property it might be up for auction in a few months time :eek:
    A house isn't a home without a cat.
    Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
    I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
    You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
    It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.
  • Isn't it Northern Rock who do the 125% LTV "mortgages" with part as a mortgage and part as an unsecured loan? This is a bit of a dilemma for them if the house doesn't cover the loans. They can sell or repossess at a loss or try and get the extra out of him first, neither of which I can see happening. I would be tempted to say that if you really want this property it might be up for auction in a few months time :eek:

    They certainly do. The first 95% of the house value is secured against the
    house and any amount above that is an unsecured (can Northern Rock demand payment then, as it is unsecured?) loan at the same rate as the mortgage. The actual LTV is only 95%.

    We were contemplating going with them, but I'm glad I didn't now!
  • regularsaver1
    regularsaver1 Posts: 4,930 Forumite
    sounds like the problem they have is the seller is moving abraod - where they can't chase him for debt
  • BarmyBubba
    BarmyBubba Posts: 122 Forumite
    Yeah, but he is already living there now which is what I suppose is delaying things. Surely from Northern Rock's point of view it would be better for the house sale to go through and him to pay off his mortgage?
  • silvercar
    silvercar Posts: 50,792 Ambassador
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Academoney Grad Name Dropper
    If they let him pay off the mortgage and release the charge on the property they will recover only the 95% of the property value. If they know he is in Thailand they risk kissing goodbye to the rest.

    Now they know he is not living at the property, you can bet he's got a residential mortgage, so he's probably in breach of his mortgage terms. This gives them grounds for repossession. At least then they can recover 100% of the current value of the property rather than 95% of the original purchase price. I'm assuming that they have conditions in their mortgage which allows them to use the security to recover other loans. It may be that not having a UK address breaches the loan terms.

    There is still a chance that they will accept the cousin's address or even accept the cousin having power of attorney or the cousin may be in a position to guarentee the loan.
    I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.