'£50 now or £1,000 in ten years?' poll discussion

edited 20 April 2010 at 10:12AM in Money Saving Polls
50 replies 5.4K views
Former_MSE_LawrenceFormer_MSE_Lawrence Former MSE
975 Posts
edited 20 April 2010 at 10:12AM in Money Saving Polls
Poll Started 20 April 2010:

£50 now or £1,000 in ten years?


Are you focused on short term or long term cash? Suppose you were offered the following choice (with a rock solid government-backed guarantee that provided you’re still alive you’ll get the cash).

If the alternative was £1,000 in ten years time, please select the FIRST you’d be willing to take.

A. £10 now
B. £50 now
C. £150 now
D. £250 now
E. £500 now
F. £750 now
G. I’d wait to get £1,000 in 10 years' time.

Please vote here, or click 'post reply' to discuss below. Thanks :)

[threadbanner]box[/threadbanner]
«1345

Replies

  • raj75raj75 Forumite
    444 Posts
    I am not sure everyone understood the question..
    Over 40% people voted for £750 now.. I don't think those 40% will say they don't need "£500 now" instead of "£1000 in 10 year time".
  • Short term is a relative concept - I would quite happily wait, say, a few months to get the £500 rather than taking it now. To me, anything within a year is 'short term', a year to five years is 'medium term' and beyond that is 'long term'.

    Then again I suppose it depends how much you need the cash as to what you'd take when. I went for £500 now as that would help out my 'saving to move to London' fund massively, but the £1000 in ten years would probably end up in savings as well, so how much difference it makes to me personally I'm not sure.

    /pointless post
    "A mind needs books as a sword needs a whetstone, if it is to keep its edge." - Tyrion Lannister
    Married my best friend 1st November 2014
    Loose = the opposite of tight (eg "These trousers feel a little loose")
    Lose = the opposite of find/gain (eg "I'm going to lose weight this year")
  • djb77djb77 Forumite
    17 Posts
    If you factor in inflation at say 3% on £1,000 in 10 years in would be the equivalent of £740 today and therefore, I voted for F.
  • King_WeaselKing_Weasel Forumite
    4.4K Posts
    To prefer £10 now you would need a discount factor of over 58%, but to prefer £750 now it would be 2.92%. So if you think annual inflation would average more than this you should certainly go for option F. Option E (£500) has an internal rate of return of 7.2% compared with G, so I would rule out A to E.

    I'd almost certainly go for £750 now.
    However hard up you are, never accept loans from your friends. Just gifts
  • edited 21 April 2010 at 7:16PM
    pinkshoespinkshoes Forumite
    19.1K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Forumite
    edited 21 April 2010 at 7:16PM
    Assuming I could manage to make a 5% return each year by investing it, then £614 would give me approximately £1000 in 10 years time, so I'd accept anything over this to save the hassle of investing.

    (Thus the only option was the £750 NOW option)
    Should've = Should HAVE (not 'of')
    Would've = Would HAVE (not 'of')

    No, I am not perfect, but yes I do judge people on their use of basic English language. If you didn't know the above, then learn it! (If English is your second language, then you are forgiven!)
  • MSE_MartinMSE_Martin MoneySaving Expert
    8.3K Posts
    Forumite
    Interesting readin - i will try and clear it up so everyone understands its the first option.

    I note the analysis above - but what about the

    A. I need it now feelings some will get (especially those who it could help clear debt)
    B. The risk of dying before the payout if you wait.
    Martin Lewis, Money Saving Expert.
    Please note, answers don't constitute financial advice, it is based on generalised journalistic research. Always ensure any decision is made with regards to your own individual circumstance.
    Don't miss out on urgent MoneySaving, get my weekly e-mail at www.moneysavingexpert.com/tips.
    Debt-Free Wannabee Official Nerd Club: (Honorary) Members number 000
  • LokoloLokolo Forumite
    20.9K Posts
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    I am taking £500 now as I reckon I could double it in 10 years. Thus making it the more financially viable option!

    I don't need it now, I just would like it as its the obvious choice for me.
  • Diesel44Diesel44 Forumite
    623 Posts
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Who in their right mind would turn down £750 now.
    Anything government backed must be unreliable. I think I would take now and £750 was one of the choices so whats wrong with taking £750 now, why wait 10 years for an extra £250.
  • DarkConvictDarkConvict Forumite
    6.3K Posts
    The poll needs to be more spread out.

    You have a massive gap of 10 years between F. and G.
    £500 now or £750 now, taking £500 is losing you £250 for no reason at all.
    If the opens were more like £10 now, £20 in 3 weeks, £50 in 2 months, £100 in 6 months etc. It makes more sense.
    Although no trees were harmed during the creation of this post, a large number of electrons were greatly inconvenienced.

    There are two ways of constructing a software design: One way is to make it so simple that there are obviously no deficiencies, and the other way is to make it so complicated that there are no obvious deficiencies
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides

Ask An Expert: Rewind

Check out last week's energy-themed Q&A with MSE's experts

MSE Forum

Top theatre lotteries

How to grab £10-£25 tix for Cabaret, Matilda etc

MSE Deals