Do you really wan t this man in charge of the button

Pete111

PrivatisetheNHSnow wrote: »

LOL

What evidence is there that iran is developing weapons of mass destruction - you believe the western propaganda? it's the same 'evidence' that iraq had weapons of mass destruction?

.

Hmmmm I suppose it's possible that those 3700 centrifuges (you know, the ones they themselves advertise to the world as 'fully operational') are simply for excercising the Ayatollahs large collection of pet hampsters but I'm not rushing down to Paddy power to place a wager on it.

Just because Sadamm didn't have WMD doesn't mean noone else will ever try to get them ....

Oh and yes. I would rather we had a button to push. The nuclear cat is out of the bag and I for one would prefer to own a few just in case.

PrivatisetheNHSnow

A._Badger wrote: »

And you, the sort of pusillanimous ostrich who sat back complacently while Germany established its military might prior to WWII.

Iran not a threat? That's the funniest thing I've heard since people used to run around saying the USSR was a model of the perfect state and simply wanted peace and harmony.

you are obviously brainwashed or just an imbecile - iran's economy and military is a tiny fraction of nazi germany and soviet russia. iran is thousands of miles from the uk - explain to me how it can pose a threat to the uk?

iran has a military budget that's about the same as the money we give to pensioners to pay their fuel bills. it's got no weapons of mass destruction of any kind, nor is it developing any, as the international atomic agency has recently confirmed. i suppose you were making these moronic comparisons with hitler's germany and stalin's russia when we were about to invade iraq to 'protect' ourselves from their fictional weapons of mass destruction too...

PrivatisetheNHSnow

Pete111 wrote: »

Hmmmm I suppose it's possible that those 3700 centrifuges.

have you never heard of nuclear power? it's very popular in france. iran has a growing population, they need more electricity, get over it.

why don't we bomb france then, they have a lot of uranium too?

The_White_Horse

no matter what the lefties or the guardian says (to its four readers) china cannot be trusted. the end.

The_White_Horse

PrivatisetheNHSnow wrote: »

have you never heard of nuclear power? it's very popular in france. iran has a growing population, they need more electricity, get over it.

why don't we bomb france then, they have a lot of uranium too?

"peace in our time"

PrivatisetheNHSnow

yeah you're right, iran is just like nazi germany...i'm surprised they haven't invaded the uk yet....

Flearoy

headcone wrote: »

"It's got nothing to do with nuclear anything, it would be the same if they were making sandwiches instead of submarines"



Old Chinese proverb "Man who answers question about nuclear deterrent must first consider the Subway deal of the day"

Absolutely priceless. This proverb really made me laugh, so cheers!

Flearoy

ivavoucher wrote: »

Cameron the clown.

Cameron Says China Uncertainty Requires U.K. Nuclear Deterrent

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-15/cameron-says-china-uncertainty-requires-u-k-nuclear-deterrent.html

Yes, I would want this man in charge, given the choices.

PrivatisetheNHSnow

Remember: if you are pro attacking Iran, you are pro nuclear war.

good luck....

ninky_2

i'm with clegg on getting rid of our nuclear weapons. they are expensive and unethical.

nuclear weapons don't target regimes they target populations. and having them is only going to encourage others to try to do the same. how can we tell iran not to get them when we have them?