We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Rolling Contract query and Letting Agent fee
Comments
-
Yes but I can never understand this point. The LL doens't want the risk the tenant would leave, so to achieve that the LL kicks the tenant out. It seems really odd to me, unless the LL has specific dates to work to but even then he can't be sure to meet them.OP hasn't mentioned if they even know what the LL wants to happen. If the LL wants a new fixed term agreement rather than the risk OP can leave with just 1 months notice leaving him without a tenant and income then that is his right too.
You may find that the LL, via the LA, will offer a notice to quit to OP if this is the case. Then OP will have to find a far higher admin fee than just £50.0 -
It IS odd. But you do see LL's who think in exactly that way. They want the security of a fixed term and they become very insecure at the thought of letting the tenancy go periodic, but don't bat an eyelid at the tenant moving on. I wonder if Agents tell them porkies that there must be an AST within its term for the LL to be legally protected and to prevent the sky from falling down?Yes but I can never understand this point. The LL doens't want the risk the tenant would leave, so to achieve that the LL kicks the tenant out. It seems really odd to me, unless the LL has specific dates to work to but even then he can't be sure to meet them.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards