We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

MP,s Granted Legal Aid.....

24

Comments

  • Malcolm.
    Malcolm. Posts: 1,079 Forumite
    To me, it's the system which is broke, MP's being able to claim legal aid simply acts to highlight the issue.

    I'm not aware of the inns and outs of it all, however I do know the british legal system is expensive to the taxpayer, by European comparison.
  • nickmason
    nickmason Posts: 848 Forumite
    drc wrote: »
    It's a testament to how morally bankrupt our politicians and the whole justice system has become. They have no moral integrity whatsoever. It's all about money nowadays. Money and power.

    Heard somebody on the radio the other day talking about Profumo. How, upon his disgrace, he resigned from politics - including the privy council - and spent the rest of his life in voluntary work on community projects in the east end.

    Different times.
  • nickmason
    nickmason Posts: 848 Forumite
    tomterm8 wrote: »
    They are entitled to a fair trial, like any other [STRIKE]criminals[/STRIKE] citizens. Part of that is getting legal aid, if you are in the crown court.

    You're right. And to an extent we're all guilty of prejudging them. But it seems to me that their defence is going to be a technical one, and that they should realise that they - who chose to put their lives in the public sphere - are guilty in the eyes of the public, and that they should do the honourable thing.
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I don't think we should presume to know what their defence is; at the moment they are not even discussing defences. They are discussing jurisdiction. If their argument is sucessful at court, then I would expect them to be impeached by the house of commons.

    It's a chancy business, I would have thought - parliament has a reputation for being ruthless as a court. And, there is no appeal. To the extent the American constitution explicitly prevents this kind of thing.

    They would be better off losing their argument.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • Malcolm.
    Malcolm. Posts: 1,079 Forumite
    nickmason wrote: »
    You're right. And to an extent we're all guilty of prejudging them. But it seems to me that their defence is going to be a technical one, and that they should realise that they - who chose to put their lives in the public sphere - are guilty in the eyes of the public, and that they should do the honourable thing.

    I am still a fan of innocent until proven guilty. If they get off on a technicality, the law is an !!!, and needs changed.

    To me, if the honourable thing was done, Labour and Conservatives MP's would resign, for sending troops to die in (arguably illegal) foreign wars.
  • nickmason
    nickmason Posts: 848 Forumite
    Malcolm. wrote: »
    I am still a fan of innocent until proven guilty. If they get off on a technicality, the law is an !!!, and needs changed.
    Agreed. My position is emotive. I like to think that politicians might do the right thing. They damn well wrote the rules, and they've made a living out of talking and - I hope - representing those people who've gone to them as "the advocate of last resort", part of the MPs job description. Can't they represent themselves for once? Or at least call in a favour? Apart from anything else, can't they see how it looks?:mad:
    To me, if the honourable thing was done, Labour and Conservatives MP's would resign, for sending troops to die in (arguably illegal) foreign wars.

    Oh yes. I'm still conflicted on this - I flit between disbelief that so many people could have been so wrong, and dismay that I'm "naive" to think that we can always work things out nicely, y'know, according to international law etc. I'm reading Craig Murray's autobiography at the moment, and Clare Short has just resigned over Iraq, and it makes me very worried that the world is not a place for idealism.
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    I'm not up on legal aid, but presume they had to prove they were unable to pay the legal costs themselves?? Is it means tested?
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    No, the case is at crown court there is no means testing. If they lose, the court can order them to pay costs.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • wymondham
    wymondham Posts: 6,356 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Mortgage-free Glee!
    tomterm8 wrote: »
    No, the case is at crown court there is no means testing. If they lose, the court can order them to pay costs.

    thanks..

    ... so they may have been advised to apply for legal aid?
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    I would have thought anyone going to crown court would be advised to apply for legal aid; most barristers charge at least £1,500 for half a day at the crown court. Top barristers, like the ones necessary for this case because of the complexity, could easily charge £10k-20k a day.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.