PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House purchase goes wrong

We completed on a property recently which had suffered a pipe burst in the attic during the "big freeze" in January, which caused several thousand pounds of damage to the interior. The vendor claimed on his insurance, commenced works, and assured all parties that the monies remaining from the insurance claim would pass to us as the new owners upon completion. We have emails & phone records to back this up. In order to expedite the sale, as our buyer was getting anxious, we agreed to take a price reduction in order to go forward to exchange & complete before the remedial works were finished. The contracts had already been finalised and signed by this stage, with little reference to the works to be completed :o.

Due to delays in the final exchange and completion dates (we had to obtain a new mortagage offer with a reduced asking price, searches expired, bank holidays etc), the vendor now wishes to withhold the sum negotiated as a price reduction from the insurance monies owed, and also is not allowing us to deal directly with the insurers to finalise the claim. The final claim could be higher than quoted thus far, and for some bizarre reason the vendor was paid the money directly by the insurer, instead of going to the approved contractor. The only option open to us seems to be the solicitor and county court claims route, although I am willing to take it to mediation first if it would acheive a reasonable outcome.

Any advice appreciated!

Comments

This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.3K Life & Family
  • 258.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.