We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Exchange Today. Hurrah? Maybe!
dalia_2
Posts: 16 Forumite
As the title suggests we are exchanging today on our house.
One sticking point yesterday came up and that is that we have been asked to pay for two indemnity policies that cover our conservatory.
One is for building regs and the other a restrictive covenant consent, whatever that is.
Anyway to secure exchange we have agreed to pay these but our solicitor is adamant we shouldn't pay as they are unnecessary as we didn't build the conservatory here and has been in place for over 15 years.The subject never even came up when we bought the house ourselves.
Do you think our solicitor is right to say we shouldn't budge or do we accept this is the way buyers work and cut our losses, and get on and exchange
today.
I don't want to be still arguing about this in a weeks time with no chance of winning!
Does anyone have any experience of this?
One sticking point yesterday came up and that is that we have been asked to pay for two indemnity policies that cover our conservatory.
One is for building regs and the other a restrictive covenant consent, whatever that is.
Anyway to secure exchange we have agreed to pay these but our solicitor is adamant we shouldn't pay as they are unnecessary as we didn't build the conservatory here and has been in place for over 15 years.The subject never even came up when we bought the house ourselves.
Do you think our solicitor is right to say we shouldn't budge or do we accept this is the way buyers work and cut our losses, and get on and exchange
today.
I don't want to be still arguing about this in a weeks time with no chance of winning!
Does anyone have any experience of this?
0
Comments
-
Conservatories were not subject to building regs 15 years ago. We had one built about then and the council didn't want to know. It would be worth checking with your local council what their policy is and whether anyone knows what it was all those years back.0
-
I have checked with them and they said that it would have been more of a planning issue and due to the size of it (its very small)
not very likely to have had needed planning as is well inside the boundary of our garden.Deep down I think our solicitor is right in what hes saying but its difficult when you are so close to closing your sale, as our buyer well knows no doubt!!:rolleyes:0 -
it's also quite amazing how these things crop up just before exchange isn't it? :cool:0
-
Not sure if its the same thing but my parents had an extension that they didn't have landlords permission for (they have a ground rent so techincally only own the house not the land), however as it had been built more than 12 years ago the landlord was no longer able to take any action (statue barred) and so they didn't need an indemnity policy - that may be the same with your conservatory (or it may not but similar).
Having said that the policies are likely only to be about a hundred quid each and would give your buyer peace of mind that awkward questions in the future can be avoided. You need to decide whether saving the cash is worth the stress of the brinkmanship - I'd hang on as they won't lose all the money they've put into this for a few quid.Adventure before Dementia!0 -
Its often to satisfy mortgage lenders that indemnity policies are asked for.
If you don't pay for it the buyer might end up having to, which could prove a sticking point before exchange.
And by contacting the council you would have already invalidated the policy anyway!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.6K Spending & Discounts
- 245.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.7K Life & Family
- 259.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 15.9K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards