We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

'Want it now brigade'

1356

Comments

  • PoorDave
    PoorDave Posts: 952 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Jim_B wrote:
    I disagree. I say you're paying interest because you couldn't afford to buy a house, so you had to get someone to loan you the money.

    Plane Boy; an asset is something that puts money into your pocket. Unless you're renting one out, a house is not an assets but a liability.

    I take your point.

    What about a house as a geared investment where you can expose yourself (!) to the market at £100k (for rises or falls) but only have to pay £10k capital for the chance to do so? If it doubles to £200k you've made a shed-load for not much outlay, if it halves to £50k there are bridges to throw yourself from!
    Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery
  • Jim_B_3
    Jim_B_3 Posts: 404 Forumite
    Mikeyorks wrote:
    The Inheritance Tax legislation would disagree with you.

    Doesn't make me wrong.
  • PoorDave
    PoorDave Posts: 952 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Jim_B wrote:
    Doesn't make me wrong.

    Damn this man's logic!
    Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery
  • Jim_B_3
    Jim_B_3 Posts: 404 Forumite
    PoorDave wrote:
    What about a house as a geared investment where you can expose yourself (!) to the market at £100k (for rises or falls) but only have to pay £10k capital for the chance to do so? If it doubles to £200k you've made a shed-load for not much outlay, if it halves to £50k there are bridges to throw yourself from!

    Much like your own private hedge fund. Gulp!

    Too rich for my blood, but if you're a high-stakes gambler I can see the excitement in doing so. At least the banks won't break your legs and chuck you off the bridge like 'Big Tony' would if you lost his 90k.
  • Mikeyorks
    Mikeyorks Posts: 10,380 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    PoorDave wrote:
    Damn this man's logic!

    It's not logic .... it's one of your bridges!;)
    If you want to test the depth of the water .........don't use both feet !
  • Jim_B_3
    Jim_B_3 Posts: 404 Forumite
    PoorDave wrote:
    Damn this man's logic!

    The tax man is hardly likely to miss an opportunity to help himself. When inherited, it is an asset, as you have shelled out nothing and gained a house (someone has, in essence, put a house in your pocket). If you keep hold of it, though, it rapidly becomes a liability, as it will now start taking money out of your pocket.

    If you paid for it yourself, you have swapped money for a house, breaking even for the first five seconds, and then the house starts taking money out of your pocket.


    Nonetheless, I maintain that an asset puts money in your pocket, and a liability takes money out.
  • PoorDave
    PoorDave Posts: 952 Forumite
    500 Posts
    Jim_B wrote:
    True though. The tax man is hardly likely to miss an opportunity to help himself. Nonetheless, I maintain that an asset puts money in your pocket, and a liability takes money out.

    So when you buy a house you're paying interest for the chance to show all and sundry that the item you said was an asset turned out to be a liability?

    Perhaps.

    Are you saying an asset has to bring you "income" i.e. regular money in? Rather than a far off dreamworld capital gain
    Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen nineteen and six, result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery
  • Gorgeous_George
    Gorgeous_George Posts: 7,964 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    Definitely an asset:

    1. A useful or valuable quality, person, or thing; an advantage or resource: proved herself an asset to the company.
    2. A valuable item that is owned.

    :)

    GG
    There are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.
  • Jim_B_3
    Jim_B_3 Posts: 404 Forumite
    PoorDave wrote:
    So when you buy a house you're paying interest for the chance to show all and sundry that the item you said was an asset turned out to be a liability?

    Perhaps.

    Are you saying an asset has to bring you "income" i.e. regular money in? Rather than a far off dreamworld capital gain

    You're paying interest because you owe someone a lot of money, and they want interest as well as their money back. Ignore that for now, and assume you paid cash.

    You now have a house. There are associated costs, and as such the house is a liability. A constant drain on your pocket.

    To my mind, an asset is something that puts money into your pocket. If, at the end of everything you sell the house and tot up the totals and find that after all the outgoings you managed to make a profit, the house turned out to be an asset after all, so long as you managed to swallow the outgoings without going bankrupt/losing the house/etc.

    I am uncomfortable withthe idea of labelling a house an asset whilst it's losing you money simply because you hope you can one day sell it for more than you paid for it. What would be a better term?

    Can we liken it to a long, long spin on a roulette wheel, in which you have to constantly pay money out as the wheel spins?
  • Jim_B_3
    Jim_B_3 Posts: 404 Forumite
    2. A valuable item that is owned.

    If you live in your own house, you pay council tax/maintenance/etc.

    Doesn't sound like value to me.

    Note to people clutching their heads and screaming. Yes, renting a place to live in is also a liability. It turns out that wanting to stay alive turns out to be a liability. Such is life. Just because you own something other people would give you money for does not make it an asset to you.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.