PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING

Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.

We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Buying a flat already with tenants in

Hi

I've shortlisted a flat that I'm interested to buy. I'm aware some tenants are already in the flat and will be until December 2010. I've been told by the estate agent that should I purchase and then decide to move in, they can end the agreement early due to an existing clause in their tenant agreements.

My concern is, what happens if these tenants are not impressed by this and cause grief to both the letting agent and myself the new owner. The letting agent said they wont serve notice until an exchange has taken place to protect the tenants.

I assume this means that for practically the first month or so of my ownership, I will have tenants who potentially could wreck the place, refuse to pay the final rent or squat.

Is there any protection against this when you buy from someone else who initiated a tenancy or is it pretty much my own risk at this point?

I am of course taking the worst possible scenerio here but as I can't afford to be stuck in a rental property while I wait for slow tenants to leave, I need to understand my position.

Any comments welcome.

Thanks.
«1

Comments

  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,003 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 25 March 2010 at 11:42PM
    No solicitor would adivse a client to exchange contracts for Vacant Possession without the tenants actually having moved out prior to that exchange. Serving notice on tenants does not guarantee an empty property on completion day if exchange has taken place.

    You yourself will not be able to purchase a property on a residential mortgage if tenants are in place. And you can't have a BTL mortgage without a residential one.

    I cannot imagine there being insurance against this - the risk associated is high and insurers are not stupid. It's the vendor that is taking the risk of being in breach of contract on completion day if they are agreeing to Vacant Possession, not you. If they are not offering vacant possession and you are taking on a BTL then your landlord's insurance could cover potential issues with your tenants.

    It's not easy in a bouyant market to sell a place with tenants in situ. Unless the yield is magical, I doubt many people would be interested in it with tenants at all. It's wworth negotiating with the vendor rather than their letting agent.
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    you have the following choices

    -insist that the tenants move out before exchange of contracts
    -let them stay and take the risk of having to go to court to evict them
    -walk away

    it's that simple.
  • secla
    secla Posts: 337 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    yes you could have problems getting them out, id ask to see what clause is in there contract to get them out early aswell as it may not actually be enforceable

    tennanted propertys for sale usually fetch a fair bit less though so it could be worth the trouble
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 25,371 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It doesn't matter what's in the contract. Worst case scenario, it takes over 6 months to get tenants out, if they don't want to leave.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • poppysarah
    poppysarah Posts: 11,522 Forumite
    And tenants that don't want to leave might sort you out some parting gifts.
  • <sebb>
    <sebb> Posts: 453 Forumite
    You'll also need to make sure you have a 25% deposit at least as you can't get a buy to let mortgage for less than this.
  • greyster
    greyster Posts: 2,392 Forumite
    hi all, I do intend to live in the property and not BTL. I think I'll be ok because as doozergirl says, the seller will be breaching the contract if he sells a vacant posession to me with students in it!!!

    Thanks for everyones help.
  • poppy10_2
    poppy10_2 Posts: 6,581 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    greyster wrote: »
    hi all, I do intend to live in the property and not BTL.
    But your mortgage company might not be happy to hand over the funds if you do not have vacant possession.
    poppy10
  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 26 March 2010 at 10:54PM
    I'm aware some tenants are already in the flat and will be until December 2010.
    Without seeing the contract it is impossible to be sure, but my guess is this is a 12 month contract, started last December 09, and with a 6 month break clause. So the EARLIEST the tenants could be asked/told to leave is June 2010. If they don't, the owner (whether the seller or you) would have to apply for a court order, serve it, and then, if they STILL didn't leave, go back to court to enforce the order.

    So June if it goes smoothly.

    September or later if it doesn't.

    Oh, and as mentioned above, no lender will release funds on the mortgage while tenants are in occupation, and few solicitors would Exchange contracts since they act for, and have to protect, the Lender as well as you.

    Assuming a) you are getting a mortgage and b) you are using a solicitor of course.
  • diable
    diable Posts: 5,258 Forumite
    Can a contract drawn up that for every month the tenants over stay then you will be refunded 10% of the cost of the flat.

    I am surprised by this as if I was selling this type of flat I would have waited until the tenants had left but then again this is a buyers market, use it as leverage to reduce the price as it does seem that the seller is maximising his return or minimising his loss.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 347K Banking & Borrowing
  • 251.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 451.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 239.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 615.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 175K Life & Family
  • 252.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.