We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Do you think there is a lot of waste in the system?

This is a poll that try to assess the opinion of people who work either in the public sector or in the private sector.

The question today: Do you think there is a lot of waste in the system where you work or very little? (examples: too many people, too many people do little but get excellent benefits, jobs for jobs sake etc' etc').

Recently I started working with the NHS back office operation and as a first timer in the public sector it is an eye opening experience, it is so disconnected from the real economy I thought i'll try and see what other here think.
Five exclamation marks the sure sign of an insane mind!!!!!

Terry Pratchett.

Do you think there is a lot of waste in the system or just a little bit? 49 votes

I work for the private sector and there is a LOT of waste
32% 16 votes
I work for the private sector and there is LITTLE waste
16% 8 votes
I work for the public sector and there is a LOT of waste
42% 21 votes
I work for the public sector and there is LITTLE waste
8% 4 votes
«134

Comments

  • Kohoutek
    Kohoutek Posts: 2,861 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I worked in the public sector once for six months (a university) and I didn't do anything. I would say productivity was at least 50% lower than the private sector, even from quite senior staff.
  • sjaypink
    sjaypink Posts: 6,740 Forumite
    Might as well confess now, as I will probably be the only one voting for the last option.:D
    Speaking only for my dept in my area- there is now little waste- everything has been slashed the last year or 2.
    I imagine Local Authorities are worst for waste- I say this only due to hearing from friends who work there who seem to do little (albeit for very little pay), and seeing some of the responsibilities & pay ranges for higher graded positions :cool:

    I don't know. The public sector is in transition. Any dept which is currently inefficient will not be so for much longer...
    We cannot change anything unless we accept it. Condemnation does not liberate, it oppresses. Carl Jung

  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    Having worked in both public and private education, I have no shadow of a doubt which provides better education for the money.

    Clue: it's the one that isn't trying to produce a profit for shareholders/directors on top of the costs of providing an education. :)
  • carolt
    carolt Posts: 8,531 Forumite
    sjaypink wrote: »
    Might as well confess now, as I will probably be the only one voting for the last option.:D
    Speaking only for my dept in my area- there is now little waste- everything has been slashed the last year or 2.
    I imagine Local Authorities are worst for waste- I say this only due to hearing from friends who work there who seem to do little (albeit for very little pay), and seeing some of the responsibilities & pay ranges for higher graded positions :cool:

    I don't know. The public sector is in transition. Any dept which is currently inefficient will not be so for much longer...

    Great post.

    I think the imagined gravy train choo-chooed off over the horizon some years ago.

    There's been plenty of cost-cutting, redundancies, recruitment freezes etc etc since then.
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 23 March 2010 at 9:44AM
    carolt wrote: »
    Having worked in both public and private education, I have no shadow of a doubt which provides better education for the money.

    Clue: it's the one that isn't trying to produce a profit for shareholders/directors on top of the costs of providing an education. :)

    I take it is not child education you do Carol as most private schools are Charities.;)

    But for sure state schools usually have less funds at their disposal.

    My wife works for the public sector and was telling me about a job today that had come up at their council that was basically managing opening times, meeting rooms and fire alarms (Business Continuity in council speak), wage £30K.
    She says the waste in the public sector is massive, she has worked their 20 years and in that time there are now 4X as many staff yet the town population is about the same.
    I work in the private sector and my job would be at least 4 different jobs in the public sector.

    But I like to run a tight ship as I am responsible for the costs and the costs have got to be a lot less than income.
    I think the above gives an idea why there is generally less waste in the private sector.
    1 Budgets to the money given to them.
    1 Budgets to make money.
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    edited 23 March 2010 at 10:03AM
    yet another loaded poll. what do we mean by 'waste'? so if someone had a job getting paid 30k (around 600 quid a week before tax - not exactly a fortune) to manage fire alarm systems, meeting rooms and opening hours (personally i'd like to know that the fire alarm systems in public buildings were looked after by someone responsible) that is somehow more 'wasteful' than them being unemployed.

    if 4x more people are working in the public sector in your town then there clearly aren't enough jobs in the private sector. or are there loads of great private sector jobs just lying vacant because the population can't wait to get on the public sector gravy train? i doubt it.

    effeciently run (as in profit motivated) companies are not necessarily happy companies. a bit of slacking is good for the soul imho.

    can you add the option - the public sector generally provides a better working environment and is generally better at providing the non money making things that society needs.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • Really2
    Really2 Posts: 12,397 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 23 March 2010 at 10:14AM
    ninky wrote: »
    yet another loaded poll. what do we mean by 'waste'? so if someone had a job getting paid 30k (around 600 quid a week before tax - not exactly a fortune) to manage fire alarm systems, meeting rooms and opening hours (personally i'd like to know that the fire alarm systems in public buildings were looked after by someone responsible) that is somehow more 'wasteful' than them being unemployed.

    No It is managing in terms of telling people where to go. It's not technical, the average wage in that town is £20K FT.
    Sorry my wife was surprised by it as it is in reality it's an administration post at nearly twice administration wage.
    Not sure why people get offended when all I am relaying is what someone in the public sector as said.:(

    PS not really sure public sector runs "happier" as it has a higher sickness rate than the private sector.
    http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/05/14/45837/sickness-absence-rates-in-public-sector-outstrip-private-sector-by-55-in.html
  • ninky_2
    ninky_2 Posts: 5,872 Forumite
    Really2 wrote: »
    PS not really sure public sector runs "happier" as it has a higher sickness rate than the private sector.
    http://www.personneltoday.com/articles/2008/05/14/45837/sickness-absence-rates-in-public-sector-outstrip-private-sector-by-55-in.html


    and maybe people in the private sector end up going to work when they are actually sick? especially for jobs where there is no sick leave entitlement.
    Those who will not reason, are bigots, those who cannot, are fools, and those who dare not, are slaves. - Lord Byron
  • ses6jwg
    ses6jwg Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    public sector

    jobs for the boys

    maxing out of budgets at year end
  • Davesnave
    Davesnave Posts: 34,741 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    I don't think it is sensible to lump all public or private sector jobs together.

    Working in education, I was certainly not wasting anything; in fact I spent a lot of time each year raising extra money to fill the gaps! However, what I was doing bore no relation to, say, administrators' actions in the nearby hospital.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.