We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Lidl - price discrepancy / refusing to sell at price marked on product

Options
2

Comments

  • toxic1990 wrote: »




    It is true that they have to remove the incorrect price from the shelf within a reasonable time.


    .


    when i worked in retail we would always remove the item immediately and not put back on for at least 24 hours although i never found out if that was ''law'' or just a rule that we had
    Can you see the mountains through the fog?
  • gordikin
    gordikin Posts: 4,422 Forumite
    Why bother with a marker pen when you can very easily print your own barcode labels?...it's not that difficult...if you want to take your chances in Court!
  • woody01
    woody01 Posts: 1,918 Forumite
    I said that i was pretty sure he had to sell them to me for the value marked on them or remove the items from sale
    I'm 100% certain you are wrong.
  • toxic1990
    toxic1990 Posts: 201 Forumite
    when i worked in retail we would always remove the item immediately and not put back on for at least 24 hours although i never found out if that was ''law'' or just a rule that we had

    Yeah that should be the policy in shops, be im sure you are aware, working in retail things that need to be done straight away can be delayed by annoying customers. Its basically "remove it at the first possible chance, you have been informed of the mistake, if you don't correct it ASAP than you are breaking the law"

    Most big shops especially supermarkets will tends to give you the mistaken price, especially if its a low valued item.

    It is amusing the amount of people who insist that the item must be sold at the marked price, even the supervisor at my first job thought it was law, I had to bring in my text book to prove it.
  • toxic1990 wrote: »
    It is amusing the amount of people who insist that the item must be sold at the marked price, even the supervisor at my first job thought it was law, I had to bring in my text book to prove it.


    oh I know what you mean there lol

    i completed 2 NVQ's in retail, so i'm not so easy to fob off when I know what I'm talking about lol (although in most other areas i can be completely wrong and STILL insist I'm right, but then that's just me being a woman :D )
    Can you see the mountains through the fog?
  • ses6jwg
    ses6jwg Posts: 5,381 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Where I used to work, people would take "reduced" 99p stickers off some items, stick them on £10 items and attempt to have them for 99p at the till. Kids also used to go around the store moving stickers.

    They then kicked up a massive fuss when the manager refused the sale and always threatened Trading Standards etc, nothing ever happend.
  • Paul_Varjak
    Paul_Varjak Posts: 4,627 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    Of course they can refuse to sell them to. In fact, they can refuse to deal business with anyone at any price!

    The marked price is merely an 'Invitation to Treat'. You, in effect, make an offer to buy at that price when you take the goods to the checkout. The merchant can choose to accept that off or not!

    So, although you cannot force them to sell it at the price marked on the box, they may commit a criminal offence by labelling their products with the wrong price. This is hardly likely to be the case though - just a matter of simple error!
  • woody01
    woody01 Posts: 1,918 Forumite
    i completed 2 NVQ's in retail
    Richard Branson should be scared then:rotfl:
  • Darksun
    Darksun Posts: 1,931 Forumite
    Of course they can refuse to sell them to. In fact, they can refuse to deal business with anyone at any price!

    They can't refuse if it would class as sex, sexual orientation, or racial discrimination (possibly on some other discriminatory grounds as well). But I'm just nitpicking :p
  • mumOf2wonderfulkids
    mumOf2wonderfulkids Posts: 348 Forumite
    edited 24 March 2010 at 12:03AM
    woody01 wrote: »
    Richard Branson should be scared then:rotfl:


    he needn't be too scared - i work in social housing now lol! :rotfl::D
    Can you see the mountains through the fog?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.8K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.8K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.8K Life & Family
  • 257.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.