We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

'Reasonable proportionate part' of leasehold service charge - what does this mean?

In my lease it states I must pay a 'reasonable proporionate part' of the costs of managing and maintaining the building. Does this actually mean anything specific in legal terms, or is it open to variation by the freeholder?

I was a naive FTB when I bought, and although I definitely asked the solicitor about this I was just told it meant 'half the costs for the building' (there are only 2 maisonettes in the building). I only have this information in my own informal notes I took from all the questions I asked the solicitor at the time.

I have owned it for nearly 9 years and so far the only costs we have had were a small amount of painting and some guttering replaced, which was split equally between the 2 of us. The management charge is split equally across all leaseholders under the council's (freeholder's) umbrella, regardless of the size or circumstances of the property.

Just wondering if this seemingly vague wording leaves me open to paying for stuff which has nothing to do with my own building, or any other pitfalls I haven't thought of?

Comments

  • G_M
    G_M Posts: 51,977 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    There have been cases where a major maintenance programme included multiple buildings and a private leaseholder in one building was billed for a %, even though other buildings had eg more common areas, worse condition etc.

    So yes, you might end up being charged for things other than a straight 50% of your building's works.

    You could, of course, contest charges like this and claim they are not a 'reasonable proporionate part'.

    In the end, only a court could decide....
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.5K Life & Family
  • 261.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.