We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
should you still get a degree if you want to be
Comments
-
talksalot81 wrote:But it isnt just those without degrees who will comment... You will find alot of comments similar to my own, from those who are within academic circles.
Not in my experience.
People who I've heard "degree bash" have always been those who haven't got one themselves because they either don't have the capability or could never have put in enough hard work to achieve one.
Criticising the achievements of others is easy when you're too small minded to admit that perhaps they're more capable / have made better decisions than yourself."One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0 -
I didn't go to university as I wanted to work in the media and didn't think having a degree would make a great difference to my job prospects.
I think there are industries where relevant experience can be more useful than a degree, but I'd imagine it's very difficult as an 18-year-old to decide whether university is right for you or not if you don't know what sort of job you want to do..0 -
mrcow wrote:Not in my experience.
People who I've heard "degree bash" have always been those who haven't got one themselves because they either don't have the capability or could never have put in enough hard work to achieve one.
Criticising the achievements of others is easy when you're too small minded to admit that perhaps they're more capable / have made better decisions than yourself.
Maybe you just havent had enough contact within those circles... I can guarantee you that it happens. The reason is that many will get their degrees really without doing alot of work then will try and defend their 2.2 in TV studies against someone who has worked themselves as hard as they can go in order to get a first in electronics engineering (or something similar). At the end of the day the two achievements will be differentiated by a knowledgeable onlooker and one degree really will open alot more doors than the other.2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
talksalot81 wrote:I can guarantee you that it happens.
You can guarantee it all you like
I completed my science degree 12 years ago and the only people who have ever knocked it have been those who couldn't have achieved one themselves.
I'm being personal here, but I think that you are suffering from a misguided sense of "degree snobbery" in that somehow someone who achieves a degree in engineering is better than someone who graduates in "TV studies? " :rotfl:The reason is that many will get their degrees really without doing alot of work then will try and defend their 2.2 in TV studies against someone who has worked themselves as hard as they can go in order to get a first in electronics engineering (
It's the same as some people who call tradiditonal universities "real" universities as opposed to the old polytecnics that gained university status in the '90s. I seriously think you need to get over it. Further education is a good thing. If someone wants a career in the media, then why not do a degree? A close friend of mine did just that and is now (12 years later) earing over £100k working in the media. He wouldn't have got the job where he is now without his degree, and that is a fact as he joined a graduate scheme.
I also don't like the way that you're inferring that a 2.2 is somehow inferior? Thousands of students work their hearts out to achieve 2.2s and it is something to be applauded, not knocked."One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0 -
mrcow wrote:I also don't like the way that you're inferring that a 2.2 is somehow inferior? Thousands of students work their hearts out to achieve 2.2s and it is something to be applauded, not knocked.
A 2:2 is inferior, by definition. I wonder, did your school sports day not have any winners to avoid hurting anyone's feelings?0 -
surfcat wrote:A 2:2 is inferior, by definition. I wonder, did your school sports day not have any winners to avoid hurting anyone's feelings?
Don't be ridiculous.
What I was referring to was the idea that if you're going to get a 2.2 in "TV studies", you may as well not bother doing a degree (which is what was being inferred)!"One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0 -
What was being inferred is that someone with a 2.2 in TV studies is miles inferior to a first in engineering. Which it is.
I am being snobbish about the whole thing. But lets us face it, most anyone can do TV studies and get through with some work. In contrast, this is not possible with other subjects. You have done a science degree, you really should know this. There are more than a handful of people simply cannot and will not ever grasp science. This simply is not the case for something like TV studies!2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
I wouldn't be happy with a 2:2, just like I wouldn't have been happy with a D in my A-Levels. Just my ten penneth! And I'm fairly sure I could do a degree in TV studies, get a 1st and not turn up to a single lecture!0
-
missk_ensington wrote:I wouldn't be happy with a 2:2, just like I wouldn't have been happy with a D in my A-Levels. Just my ten penneth! And I'm fairly sure I could do a degree in TV studies, get a 1st and not turn up to a single lecture!
That opinion, correct or not, is fairly common (I of course have it also). It is for exactly that reason why not all degrees are equal. Employers are people too and many of them will hold similar bias towards or against certain degrees.2 + 2 = 4
except for the general public when it can mean whatever they want it to.0 -
talksalot81 wrote:I am being snobbish about the whole thing. But lets us face it, most anyone can do TV studies and get through with some work. In contrast, this is not possible with other subjects. You have done a science degree, you really should know this. There are more than a handful of people simply cannot and will not ever grasp science. This simply is not the case for something like TV studies!
I'm not disputing that some people are more mathematically or scientifically minded than others and would find such courses less of a challenge, but going back to the original post, I just can't agree with the idea that anyone doing a degree in a less traditional subject is "wasting years".
Having never studied "TV Studies" (and I'm still unsure whether there is actually a course called this
) I couldn't tell you how I'd personally do. If it involved me watching any significant amount of the car crash drivel that is beamed to my house throughout the day, I doubt I'd do too well
"One day I realised that when you are lying in your grave, it's no good saying, "I was too shy, too frightened."
Because by then you've blown your chances. That's it."0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456K Spending & Discounts
- 248.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.9K Life & Family
- 263.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards