We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Never mind Merv and Alistair - it could be worse for you!
Options
Comments
-
Yes, but the problem in the UK is we have fewer and fewer unskilled and semi-skilled jobs and more of a demand for highly skilled/professional ones. Our educational system seems completely inadequate to lift children out of welfare dependent families.0
-
How many died in that 'famine'?
Stalin did for about 20,000,000 during collectivisation. Mao killed 25,000,000 in a 2 year period IIRC. Pol Pot caused about 1/6th of the country's population to die from starvation.
As for what's going on in North Korea? We won't know until these despots (hopefully) get the Mussolini treatment* but it is highly unlikely to have been a positive time in Korean history.
Are you seriously trying to defend these people? More people died in Communist famines than in the Nazi massacres/genocides - I condemn them both and find it very hard to see why so many apparently well educated posters seem to want to defend the former while they would never think of defending the latter.
Why do you think that Communists deliberately starving their own people to death is a good thing ninky?
.
It is not a case of defending the indefensible, however Mao's great leap forward did not set out to create a famine - whereas Hitler clearly tried to exterminate a race of people (plus plenty of others).US housing: it's not a bubble
Moneyweek, December 20050 -
kennyboy66 wrote: »It is not a case of defending the indefensible, however Mao's great leap forward did not set out to create a famine....
...however, it's continuance once the results of the policy became clear was an amoral adherence to ideology over human life. And that's probably the nicest description of the policies of the time. What do you think happened to people that pointed out the deaths?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards