We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The property boom is well underway now.
Comments
-
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »So true.
People always think "this is it, house prices can never go higher".
In fact, many people were saying that in 2007, and already we have some areas where prices have crossed their previous peak.
In just 20 years time, 2007 prices will look ridiculously cheap, and a new generation of bears will be complaining and moaning about how easy the youth of today had it.
I'm increasingly worried for your sanity, as you seem to have brainwashed yourself into believing your own propaganda.0 -
Harry_Powell wrote:Whether the bears like it or not, over the 40 years of home ownership property will increase.
How? By huge immigration, by not building new houses? By lending to people that can't afford to buy property?
Subprime has been done before and it ended pretty badly!0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »I'm increasingly worried for your sanity, as you seem to have brainwashed yourself into believing your own propaganda.
Interesting.
Are you actually delusional enough to believe prices won't be higher in 20 years?
Or that prices have not crossed previous peak in some areas?“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
How? By huge immigration,
Happening now. Population grew by 408,000 people last year alone, but only part of it was through immigration.
250,000 new households formed, 80,000 houses built.by not building new houses?
Happening now. Less than half the amount we need.
And it's a long term trend. Building always lags population and household formation growth.By lending to people that can't afford to buy property?
Most can afford it just fine. Those that can't can rent, and enrich others who can buy property.Subprime has been done before and it ended pretty badly!
Not so much in the UK.
Besides, with population growing as fast as it is, theres no need for subprime.“The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.
Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”
-- President John F. Kennedy”0 -
HAMISH_MCTAVISH wrote: »Happening now. Population grew by 408,000 people last year alone, but only part of it was through immigration.
It depends if the Eastern European migrants intend to settle in the UK permanently and buy property - I doubt many of them will do that, given their families at home.
The main obstacle to house prices rising further is the huge funding gap that will open up when the government's special schemes expire - and not even the CML have an answer to how that will be solved.0 -
How? By huge immigration, by not building new houses? By lending to people that can't afford to buy property?
Subprime has been done before and it ended pretty badly!0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Mine isn't and I didn't get the option of interest only back in 2007. A repayment vehicle was a necessity.
I'll take your word for it, but still maintain that the vast majority of offset mortgages are IO by definition.
Certainly the big players like first direct, natwest/RBS, virgin one, YBS, Coventry all do interest only offsets and rely on the borrower to set up a repayment vehicle.
Generally offsets are attractive to those who have savings, so there is hope that the borrower will understand the need for a repayment plan, but there will be some for whom the penny suddenly drops.I'm a Forum Ambassador on the housing, mortgages & student money saving boards. I volunteer to help get your forum questions answered and keep the forum running smoothly. Forum Ambassadors are not moderators and don't read every post. If you spot an illegal or inappropriate post then please report it to forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com (it's not part of my role to deal with this). Any views are mine and not the official line of MoneySavingExpert.com.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Mine isn't and I didn't get the option of interest only back in 2007. A repayment vehicle was a necessity.
Majority of higher risk interest only lending was through the lenders who are no more (or at least had their wings severely clipped since).
Interest only mortgages will be a millstone for many. As they find expected increases in disposable income fails to materialise.0 -
-
LOL. No not really, I'm perfectly happy renting with my mates at the moment actually.Do you know that you don't have to own property in order to be happy?0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards