We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Payoffs for council bosses average £256,104
Comments
-
Because I didn't write the report?
How do expect me to know the details of how much was saved on pensions, moron? :rotfl:
Why don't you do the research yourself if it's such a burning issue for you...
It's a study of all 37 council chief executives that left by "mutual agreement" between January 2007 and September 2009. I've no idea how many left for other reasons - I don't work for the government mate.
much easier to froth and foam from the mouth over a large amount of money without knowing what the underlying causes are.0 -
so you can't answer the question then - what a surprise... :eek:
much easier to froth and foam from the mouth over a large amount of money without knowing what the underlying causes are.
Moron,
The underlying causes that the Audit Commission highlighed, as I quoted is the fact that too many departed because of "personal differences with elected councillors rather than poor performance."
The Audit Commission recommendedconsideration be given to advance "pre-nuptial" agreements setting out the severance terms before chief executives are hired...Proposed severance packages should be reviewed by cross-party committees first and details of any payouts should be published shortly afterwards....The report said payoffs, often following a change of political leadership, were "not always justified" and said they should not be a "reward for failure".
.....Chief executives should have appraisals, to mount evidence for a dismissal if necessary and mediation should be used "more widely" and not as a last resort.
Sorry I can't answer your random stupid question about the size of council chief executives' pensions because I don't have access to that information. Anyway, that wasn't the point of this article, which as usual you've missed.0 -
Moron,
The underlying causes that the Audit Commission highlighed, as I quoted is the fact that too many departed because of "personal differences with elected councillors rather than poor performance."
The Audit Commission recommended
Sorry I can't answer your random stupid question about the size of council chief executives' pensions because I don't have access to that information. Anyway, that wasn't the point of this article, which as usual you've missed.
keep it up - you do very well at avoiding answering questions because it doesn't suit your viewpoint :eek:0 -
oh dear kokonut - you seem to be struggling to answer questions but have an addiction to frothing at news stories...
keep it up - you do very well at avoiding answering questions because it doesn't suit your viewpoint :eek:
No, it's for the simple reason that I don't have access to details of pensions of chief executives of local authorities...0 -
No, it's for the simple reason that I don't have access to details of pensions of chief executives of local authorities...0
-
Based on Andy L posting I though I'd dig into the headline grabbing 26% figure.
Only 15% of my local Council Income comes from Council Tax.
26% of the 15% Council Tax gives 4% of Council income used for pensions, but a headline of "4% of Council income is being spent on local authority pensions" doesn't bring out Mr Angry.
What of the remaining 85%, does none of that go towards pensions ?"There's no such thing as Macra. Macra do not exist."
"I could play all day in my Green Cathedral".
"The Centuries that divide me shall be undone."
"A dream? Really, Doctor. You'll be consulting the entrails of a sheep next. "0 -
the right answer - which proves the fact that amount you quote (which is a large amount of money) means nothing at all as it provides us with no perspective to the issue in hand aprt from those who like to froth and get excited easily...
How do you know that without knowing what 'the right answer' is?0 -
the right answer is in reference that you don't know the answer... which is proved by this post whic you completely avoided (again)...Based on Andy L posting I though I'd dig into the headline grabbing 26% figure.
Only 15% of my local Council Income comes from Council Tax.
26% of the 15% Council Tax gives 4% of Council income used for pensions, but a headline of "4% of Council income is being spent on local authority pensions" doesn't bring out Mr Angry.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards