We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Those that tried to get CC "written off" could face £30k bill

13»

Comments

  • I just read the first of the cases and it seems that HSBS offered to waive rights to its court cost if the defendent discontinued the action as it was clear there was no hope of success. Their solicitors agreed there was no hope of wining dicontinued the action but claimed costs till March 09. So HSBC stuck to their guns and the Judge awarded HSBC full costs. How daft!

    Yes, well summed up. The Solicitors decided to bash on for costs, even though their claim was destined for failure. The Bank acted reasonably in offering them a get out ie 'if you discontinue now, we'll each pay our own costs'.

    But because the Solicitors opted to fight on for their costs, even though they were abandoning their claims (losing, in effect), the Judge awarded costs against the Claimants.

    If you discontinue your case, you have to pay the other side's costs, unless there are exceptional circumstances (Waksman gives a few examples in his judgment). No exceptional circumstances appertained to these credit write-off cases.

    The problem with the way in which these cases were being brought is this- unless and until they actually issue a case, solicitors doing these sort of claims have got no chance of getting paid anything (as the banks point blank refused to settle out of court- rightly so, it would seem from the Carey judgment).

    If a solicitor abandons a no-win no-fee case, he doesn't get paid. There will be thousands of cases out there now, in county courts across the land which will have to be discontinued, with claimants (or their no-win no-fee insurance, if there is any) paying all the bank's costs, or being struck out by the Courts because they are now doomed to fail- the costs consequences will be the same.

    Oh dear, oh dear. If something looks too good to be true, it's usually because it is too good to be true....
  • SusieT
    SusieT Posts: 1,267 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I think the solicitors would have taken out insurance for their fees, but I'm not sure if the insurers would pay out if the solicitors have not acted properly and if they have been closed down that would seem to be the case.

    As an aside, I have heard that Cartel have started up again under a different name :(
    Credit card debt - NIL
    Home improvement secured loans 30,130/41,000 and 23,156/28,000 End 2027 and 2029
    Mortgage 64,513/100,000 End Nov 2035
    2022 all rolling into new mortgage + extra to finish house. 125,000 End 2036
  • soul619
    soul619 Posts: 562 Forumite
    any stories on people gutted they have ended up with bigger debts yet?
  • ILW
    ILW Posts: 18,333 Forumite
    soul619 wrote: »
    any stories on people gutted they have ended up with bigger debts yet?

    Think they are keeping their heads down and hoping it will all go away.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.