We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Pulling out of house purchase

2»

Comments

  • Doozergirl
    Doozergirl Posts: 34,082 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    G_M wrote: »
    What did the HIP say/show?

    If the Title and /or Plan showed the parking space, then the EA did nothing wrong. If it clearly did NOT show the parking, the EA should have known. If it was in some way ambiguous but appeared to corrolate with what the seller told the agent, then I'd imagine the EA was justified.

    Surely the EA is expected to know what the HIP shows, but cannot be expected to do further detailed searches which are the domain of lawyers?

    Aside from the simple fact that they should have had sight of the HIP before marketing commenced and it contradicts their advertising, if they are not sure, they don't put it - that is easier than doing the conveyancing yourself.

    OP I think you have them on this point. The disclaimer stands for nothing if they simply couldn't be bothered to check. Trading Standards...
    Everything that is supposed to be in heaven is already here on earth.
  • bunzee
    bunzee Posts: 122 Forumite
    Cool, I'll give Trading Standards a call in the morning and see what they say :)
  • david29dpo
    david29dpo Posts: 3,976 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    When people say the HIP is useless, this is one case (and i have seen many) that is is not. I also agree the agent is at fault here.
  • Emmzi
    Emmzi Posts: 8,658 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    did you ask for the HIP before offering?
    Debt free 4th April 2007.
    New house. Bigger mortgage. MFWB after I have my buffer cash in place.
  • GDB2222
    GDB2222 Posts: 26,526 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    edited 16 March 2010 at 11:58AM
    I think their defence would be
    a) The description was fair, ie the parking is allocated to the 9 houses, rather than being available for anyone, and
    b) The difference is not material, given that in practice that space has been used by that house for years.

    I am not sure that Trading Standards will want to spend money prosecuting this case. They must have bigger fish. Still, no harm trying.
    No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?
  • bunzee
    bunzee Posts: 122 Forumite
    According to my solicitor the spaces are actually owned by the Highways Agency so they're not really even allocated to any of the houses, literally anyone can park there.

    I called the Consumer Line for Trading Standards and they've said the best person to advise me would be my solicitor, however they have sent the information to the local TS office as they did think there had been a breach of the Act which needs looking into.
  • timmyt
    timmyt Posts: 1,628 Forumite
    This is highly technical.

    If the seller now simply pulls out/declines your offer he immediately sorts out his and the agents possible misrepresentation. He is entitled to pull out right up to an exchange.

    That's the UK system for you.

    Putting that aside, you have your own problem to prove. How can you actually prove that you are withdrawing because of this one factor and not any other. Buyers change their minds a right the UK system gives you.

    This whole issue is complex.

    However, I would ask your lawyer to speak to his litigation team for you.

    Let us know how you get on OP.
    My posts are just my opinions and are not offered as legal advice - though I consider them darn fine opinions none the less.:cool2:

    My bad spelling...well I rush type these opinions on my own time, so sorry, but they are free.:o
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.