We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Brilliant
Comments
-
www.theonion.com for those of you who keep a sharp eye on the happenings across 'the Pond''The only thing that helps me keep my slender grip on reality is the friendship I have with my collection of singing potatoes'
Sleepy J.0 -
www.theonion.com for those of you who keep a sharp eye on the happenings across 'the Pond'
IIRC on september 12 2001 the onion ran a headline that read "holy forkin !!!!!! we're under attack!"
Brilliant!:DIt's getting harder & harder to keep the government in the manner to which they have become accustomed.0 -
Before reading it I couldn't quite summerise why I hate modern politics so much. And this made me realise what it is: they need to stop just d*cking around with everything.
I absolutely agree - not just because d*cking around with everything is so annoying, and often petty - but it's also SO expensive. I have a favourite metaphor for this - in rowing, you only adjust the course occasionally because applying the rudder causes drag.
So it should be with politics - instead we have continual change at a micro level (all in the name of "something must be done"). All that change is drag on productivity in the private sector, and drag on the economy as a whole as the public sector expands to implement/deal with it (no doubt with expensive change consultants).
Of course, what then happens is that the original problem morphs into something else, through a loophole in the badly drafted legislation - and the cycle starts all over again...
Incidentally I also think the amount of legislation is absurd, with most people - from attorney general down - not knowing what is and isn't within the law - but that's another matter.0 -
Not sure what is wrong and expensive about the provision of healthy eating advice, the mash satires are sometimes funny but not this one for me.'Just think for a moment what a prospect that is. A single market without barriers visible or invisible giving you direct and unhindered access to the purchasing power of over 300 million of the worlds wealthiest and most prosperous people' Margaret Thatcher0
-
Not sure what is wrong and expensive about the provision of healthy eating advice, the mash satires are sometimes funny but not this one for me.
I think that the site is using the idea of a chip shop and healthy eating to make a point about the way the current government acts and behaves, rather than saying that healthy eating advice is a bad thing.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards