We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
House in whose name?
Comments
- 
            i've unfortunately seen couples recently that come to be to do transfer of equity applications - to remove someone from mortgage - only 4 months after it started0
 - 
            we recently bought a house with one person on the mortgage, and therefore only one name on the ownership
so our solictors advised us to get a "deed of trust" which basically states we jointly own the house (you can write them for different percentages) so that should we split up or one of us dies, than the other still has legal rightsSee the stars they’re shining brightEverything’s alright tonight0 - 
            cupid_stunt wrote:This is very similar to my situation in that I paid the majority deposit on our house, while hubby got the mortgage based on his earnings. But the mortgage is still joint even though I pay nothing for it, and my money wasn't taken into account when we took it on. Therefore the house is also in joint names.
You really should question that just in case anything happens. The mortgage should be joint between you and your partner even if he was the one who took it out.
Unfortunately I have bad credit (my ex ran up debt in my name after we split, its currently going to court). If we got a joint mortgage then we were only offered about £70,000; however if my partner got a mortgage on his own, they would give us up to £110,000. Needless to say, with prices the way they are, we needed the higher mortgage so I couldnt 'own' my house.2012 wins approx £11,000 including 5k to spend on a holiday :j0 - 
            kit wrote:Unfortunately I have bad credit (my ex ran up debt in my name after we split, its currently going to court). If we got a joint mortgage then we were only offered about £70,000; however if my partner got a mortgage on his own, they would give us up to £110,000. Needless to say, with prices the way they are, we needed the higher mortgage so I couldnt 'own' my house.
Kit, what a pillock your ex must be, I hope it gets all sorted in court!0 - 
            kit wrote:Unfortunately I have bad credit (my ex ran up debt in my name after we split, its currently going to court). If we got a joint mortgage then we were only offered about £70,000; however if my partner got a mortgage on his own, they would give us up to £110,000. Needless to say, with prices the way they are, we needed the higher mortgage so I couldnt 'own' my house.
Just because you have debts does not mean you cannot be on the mortgage or deed.
However if the debts are that bad that someone is suing you, you might stand the risk of getting it placed against the property or you personally. So in your case it might have been a good move.
However once your debts are gone you should at the next remortgage be added, earning money or not.0 - 
            InMyDreams wrote:
So does your insurance not cover you if anything happened to you? I may be just a housewife, but I'm covered too. Without me, dh would have a hard time holding down his job and looking after the house and three small children (even if he could afford that level of childcare which probably doesn't even exist!). At the very least, he'd have to take a huge hit to his salary, rendering him unable to keep up repayments. I consider myself to make an invaluable contribution (literally, because you can't put a value on it, lol).
Unfortunately a small health problem has excluded me from being insured
Luckily his children are now grown up so we dont have the worries of losing my contribution, which i agree that although it hasnt been monetry for sometime, it has been as valueable if not more so. Without me being at home keeping everything ticking along, he wouldnt have been able to have built up his business giving us the income we now enjoy
                        0 - 
            UK007BullDog wrote:Just because you have debts does not mean you cannot be on the mortgage or deed.
However if the debts are that bad that someone is suing you, you might stand the risk of getting it placed against the property or you personally. So in your case it might have been a good move.
However once your debts are gone you should at the next remortgage be added, earning money or not.
I am not being taking to court - I am taking my ex to court. I have paid off the debt so am trying to get it back from him!
The debt did mean that I couldnt go on the mortgage - as i explained about, we could only get a low mortgage if I was on it. I work but they still wouldnt do it.
I have been advised that we can look at adding me to the mortgage in about 3 years.2012 wins approx £11,000 including 5k to spend on a holiday :j0 - 
            kit - i do applications to add people/remove people from mortgages - Transfer of equity. You will need a solicitor at that time to do the transfer. but also you have to meet criteria on lender as normal0
 - 
            Ok, all people buying a house whether married or not ought to have a tenants in common or deed of trust document drawn up which clearly states who owns what share if the situation is an equal one!
I put 75k into our house whilst I needed my partners salary to get the mortgage. We had the mortgage in joint names even though I had no earnings at the time. I had a tenents in common document drawn up that split the property 76/24 in my favour. It's my deposit, why should I have to give half of that up?
Anyway, we are married now but my husband never wanted the house in his name anyway so now I am back at work I remortgaged and did a transfer of equity so that everything is in my name.
He is obviously trusting me that I wil offer him something if we ever split as he contributes to the mortgage payments.
                        0 
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
 - 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
 - 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
 - 454.3K Spending & Discounts
 - 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
 - 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
 - 177.5K Life & Family
 - 259.1K Travel & Transport
 - 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
 - 16K Discuss & Feedback
 - 37.7K Read-Only Boards