We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Should i put my savings into bricks and mortar?
Comments
-
i typed out a big post for this thread but when i hit submit it was very slow and eventually came up with cannot display page.
tried refreshing and using browser back etc. but it had gone.
any idea if i can retrieve it?
is it lurking somewhere on my computer?0 -
stphnstevey wrote:Ok, so property prices might not be the lowest they have ever been, but there not the highest they have ever been either.
Check out the plot on top of:
http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/
I am not saying buying is wrong. Everyone decides on his own circumstances (also I am undecided myself wheter to buy or not at present).
But data is data and let's try to be precise when we pass them on.
Prices on average nationwide *are* the highest they have ever been both in absolute values and in terms of cost/earnings ratios. http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/graphs-average-house-price-to-earnings-ratio.php
This is something that really worries me....0 -
"I know nothing about options! I also don't think you can gear them as benificially as property? "
Case proven m'lud.
"This is were property far exceeds shares."
No it doesn't. One investment is geared the other isn't.
"Not everyone got repossessed, in fact the majority didn't."
I don't know what proportion of the people repossessed in the early nineties had bought in the previous few years, but I suspect it was disproportionately balanced towards those who had. You say property is the best investment in the long term, so where did they go wrong? Or what went wrong for them?
"The fact is NO ONE (not even you Bob) knows what the future will bring."
So how come you know that "....over the long term house prices DO rise (as I have been saying in the posts below for a while now......).
and yes, so does gold and shares, but not at the same return on investment (ROI)."A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
carpy wrote:i typed out a big post for this thread but when i hit submit it was very slow and eventually came up with cannot display page.
tried refreshing and using browser back etc. but it had gone.
any idea if i can retrieve it?
is it lurking somewhere on my computer?
Unfortunately it has been lost. If it happens again trying clicking 'back' (if it does reappear copy it to note pad before pressing submit incase it fails again). I also hate it when that happens.
Any chance of retyping it?0 -
BobProperty wrote:"Not everyone got repossessed, in fact the majority didn't."
I don't know what proportion of the people repossessed in the early nineties had bought in the previous few years, but I suspect it was disproportionately balanced towards those who had. You say property is the best investment in the long term, so where did they go wrong? Or what went wrong for them?
What i'd like to know is what percentage of people who bought at the peak lost their homes. Also, what was the typical mortgage multiple of the people who lost their homes.
What i'm saying is, sure, most people didn't lose their homes. Like now most people don't care if prices rise or not, their mortgage is tiny for them. But it would be interesting to compare it to today, so we can come up with a statistic saying 50% of those who borrow x times their salary or more lost their homes.0 -
I agree this would be interesting. I'm surprised one of the housepricecrash forums hasn't got it.F_T_Buyer wrote:What i'd like to know is what percentage of people who bought at the peak lost their homes. Also, what was the typical mortgage multiple of the people who lost their homes.
What i'm saying is, sure, most people didn't lose their homes. Like now most people don't care if prices rise or not, their mortgage is tiny for them. But it would be interesting to compare it to today, so we can come up with a statistic saying 50% of those who borrow x times their salary or more lost their homes.
It would be tempting to say "New customers only".A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
CML website has some stats but I'm still looking and trying to interpret them. One thing so far is the "other" mortgages in the early 90's at a high level. And there's a massive amount of equity withdrawal recently.
http://www.cml.org.uk/cml/statistics
Right - final thoughts - see table ML4 - income multiplier doesn't appear to be a factor it looks like affordability is the thing, look at the "interest payments as % of income" which has only been over 20% from Q3 1988 to Q3 1991.A house isn't a home without a cat.
Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others.
I have writer's block - I can't begin to tell you about it.
You told me again you preferred handsome men but for me you would make an exception.
It's a recession when your neighbour loses his job; it's a depression when you lose yours.0 -
i can't remember exactly what i typed but it was along of the lines of......
when will be the best time to buy (a home) between now and 2010 when my mum retires? i know (how long is a piece of string) but i have no idea of the property market other than what i read/hear in the papers/on the news etc. some say there will be a crash, others that they will increase by a further 50%, others that they will just rise steadily???
i'm sure others on here have a better idea than me, and although no-one knows for sure, what is the most likely outcome in your opinion?
i'm almost priced out of the market now but what position will i be in in 4 years time?!?!?
i'm assuming prices will probably increase further (by how much i've no idea), and the suggestion is interest rates could be on the way up too.
i'm pretty sure by modest salary will only increase by 2ish% a year over the next few years and my savings will obviously increase but will this be outstripped by price/interest rises???
that's what i'm worried about, do i jump on the bandwagon quick, before it's too late or hope prices/rates don't change much by 2010 or the best scenario (for me but not for millions of others!!) a crash!!!
HELP!!!!!0 -
carpy wrote:i can't remember exactly what i typed but it was along of the lines of......
when will be the best time to buy (a home) between now and 2010 when my mum retires? i know (how long is a piece of string) but i have no idea of the property market other than what i read/hear in the papers/on the news etc. some say there will be a crash, others that they will increase by a further 50%, others that they will just rise steadily???
i'm sure others on here have a better idea than me, and although no-one knows for sure, what is the most likely outcome in your opinion?
NOBODY on here (this is important, so I'll repeat it - NOBODY on here) knows for sure and you'll be surprised, as much as they'll try and blind you with statistics (which by picking specific statistics can back up any arguement either way), how little everyone else knows. So your not alone.
What you need to do is decide if it's the right time for YOU. Only YOU know that.
i'm almost priced out of the market now but what position will i be in in 4 years time?!?!?
You could be unable to afford the smallest of homes OR you could have taken on unmanagable debt and being reposessed. I think as long as you take out debt that is managable in the worst of circumstances OR take out insurance or a fixed/capped rate if you feel you wouldn't be able to manage in the worst circumstances AND you can afford to wait out a bad turn in the market, then you'll be fine buying.
i'm assuming prices will probably increase further (by how much i've no idea), and the suggestion is interest rates could be on the way up too.
i'm pretty sure by modest salary will only increase by 2ish% a year over the next few years and my savings will obviously increase but will this be outstripped by price/interest rises???
that's what i'm worried about, do i jump on the bandwagon quick, before it's too late or hope prices/rates don't change much by 2010 or the best scenario (for me but not for millions of others!!) a crash!!!
A crash in house prices is only bad for those that have to sell or move. Maybe you should consider how long you are likely to live in your house and then consider what YOU think is going to happen in that period of time.
HELP!!!!!0 -
carpy wrote:i'm almost priced out of the market now but what position will i be in in 4 years time?!?!?
i'm assuming prices will probably increase further (by how much i've no idea), and the suggestion is interest rates could be on the way up too.
Well if IR's do go up, you will be making more on your savings, and house prices may be going down.
So in 4 years time you may be in a much better position.
But it all depends on how much IR's,energy,taxes, unemployment go up, and how long you can wait or want to wait.
There are no guarantees in life, but i'm in no rush, and i'm gonna wait it out, with my deposit invested elsewhere.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.8K Spending & Discounts
- 247.9K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.8K Life & Family
- 262.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards