We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Higher Lending Charges. Fair or Unfair??

Options
Hi. In June 2008 I had to get a 95% mortgage. Because of this, RBS charged me £2.5k as a higher lending charge on top of all the other fees for setting up the mortgage and the valuation etc etc. Does anyone know if these charges are legal or not? I believe this could be nearly as big as the Bank Charges phenomenon thats been going on the last couple of years because there are thousands of people that are being charged this fee, plus the interest on top of it, which is a lot of money. Please help anyone!!
«1

Comments

  • Wutang_2
    Wutang_2 Posts: 2,513 Forumite
    Help what?

    Help people use their brains or not? If you didnt like it, then why did you agree to it?

    I think you are over emphasising the 'phenomenom' - I would put it on the scale of the infamous liver and onions phenomenom.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • dwsjarcmcd
    dwsjarcmcd Posts: 1,857 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    These fees are legal and have been questioned many times, so I'm afraid you are wrong about your assersion about this being news. It isn't.
    As Wutang says, if you didn't like it why did you buy it? Oh it's because no lender would have given you a loan if you wern't prepared to pay the HLC
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    If you borrow a high proportion of your property's value typically 90 per cent/95 in your case above the lender may charge a higher-lending fee. They will use part of this to pay for an insurance policy to cover themselves if you can't keep up your repayments, as you are deemed as a higher risk.

    It is sensible to consider all the costs, fees, interest rates, incentives and other features before deciding which product may be the best for you..... a "canny" borrower should be able to avoid HLC entirely.

    Quote: I believe this could be nearly as big as the Bank Charges phenomenon
    Couldn't have put it any better than the previous posters!!
  • HLC is an insurance premium. You pay to protect the lender against any loss in the event of a repo. It costs a lot when you get up to high LTV's. It is normally applied after 75% LTV but its cheaper at that level and the lender pays it.

    It came about after the last crash in the 80s-90s I believe. SOme lenders have there own policy putting the money in a big lump to cover them but most pay for an indemnity policy.

    Did you know, that if they repo and claim, the insurance policy can come after you and will come after you for the loss?

    I forget the name of it, but I am sure one the brokers will remember!

    It is a fair fee as its upfront and should be explained clearly and you should be told of the above. You should also be told if the lender pays for it as you could still be liable for loss.
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." Thomas Jefferson
    "How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?" Woody Allen

    Debt Apr 2010 £0
  • Certainly totally legal - and probably fairly applied (which will be the actual test if taken to that level).

    I sometimes feel that it is 'less than equitable' in that it is paid by the client and protects only the lender BUT if it were to protect the client (i.e paying the mortgage where the the client is unable to do so, and thereby possibly protecting credit rating etc - depending upon when a claim was serviced) it would be considerably more difficult to administer and certainly very much more expensive.

    There are indeed additional insurance options which will protect the client (albeit within a somewhat more restricted definition) - and some of these these are not exempt from from well publicised 'issues' of their own.

    The fact remains that the lenders, understandably for many reasons, consider high LTVs as higher risk lending and will reflect that in the overall package (either as higher interest rates, increased application fee) if they cannot utilise the 'higher lending charge' vehicle. OR will further reduce the availability of high LTV loans and a lot of prospective customers will not thank you for that!

    .... and a personal opinion .... you did not 'have to get a 95% mortgage' you chose to get one! In doing so you were presumably aware of the costs, and their make up, involved and still took the decision to proceed!
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    Dan_1976 wrote: »

    Used to be referred to as a MIG mortgage indemnity guarantee
  • dunstonh
    dunstonh Posts: 119,646 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    plus the interest on top of it, which is a lot of money. Please help anyone!!

    They do not charge interest on top of it.

    What you mean is that you chose to buy a house with a mortgage without having sufficient savings to be able to put down a large enough deposit to avoid this fee. You also failed to have enough savings to cover the MIG and you chose to add it to the mortgage and therefore are paying interest because of that.
    I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.
  • Dan_1976
    Dan_1976 Posts: 943 Forumite
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »
    Dan_1976 wrote: »

    Used to be referred to as a MIG mortgage indemnity guarantee

    No, i meant the right to claim the loss from the client by the insurance firm. It has a phrase of some type.

    MIG, not heard that for a while!
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." Thomas Jefferson
    "How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?" Woody Allen

    Debt Apr 2010 £0
  • VIGILANT22
    VIGILANT22 Posts: 2,516 Forumite
    Dan_1976 wrote: »
    VIGILANT22 wrote: »

    No, i meant the right to claim the loss from the client by the insurance firm. It has a phrase of some type.

    MIG, not heard that for a while!

    Subrogation?
  • Dan_1976
    Dan_1976 Posts: 943 Forumite
    Subrogation, thats the one! lol you must be board! thanks
    "Banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies." Thomas Jefferson
    "How can I believe in God when just last week I got my tongue caught in the roller of an electric typewriter?" Woody Allen

    Debt Apr 2010 £0
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.9K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.