We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Witholding depost in case of unpaid bills?
Comments
- 
            Regarding the 3x penalty, there has just been the first precendent-setting case under Judge Tugendhat. He decided that in some circumstances late compliance might get you around paying the penalty, which is a big shame, but the legislation is badly drafted.* So it may not be a bad idea to just go for the settlement if you can.
 * For those interested, visit nearlylegal. Basically he decided that late compliance is not enough to inflict a penalty, but somewhat bizarrely not meeting the official requirements of the schemes (which can include 14 day compliance, but not in all cases) does incur a penalty.
 One of the schemes figured this problem out and wrote the 14 days into their requirements, but the other two have not.0
- 
            Thanks again PoP. He has sent me an email confirming bits now. It all seems above board but if you can confirm what you all think that will be great.
 Further to our conversation earlier I can confirm that I am agreeing to cease the tenancy in advance of the contracted date to enable you to move to the new property, the planned moving date being 28th February. I will look at the number of days rent you have paid for in advance and when we settle the deposit I will also refund you on the days you have not lived there pro rata.
 As I have not needed to use a Letting Agent to find replacement tenants there are no reletting fees you would need to contribute towards.
 The terms in the contract still apply in relation to your responsibilities during and after the terminantion of the tenancy. An example would include you providing proof of closure on utility accounts.
 Paul will contact you to arrange a time to meet ot do the move out inventory and take meter readings.
 I hope this is what you needed.
 Kind regards,
 :A
 0
- 
            You could consider contacting the utility companies now and asking them whether upon receipt of the final readings by telephone on check-out day they can issue a bill on their system immediately which you can then settle immediately in turn by paying with a debit-card over the phone in front of the person doing the final check-out and they can write you out a cheque for the deposit once you've done it. That way, there might only be a couple of days to cover the payments while their cheque clears.0
- 
            nikki_angel wrote: »Spoken to landlord, he is emailing me a statement to say he is releasing us early with no penalty. Haven't mentioned deposit yet as we may well get it back no probs. My new EA are livid on my behalf though and keep shouting 3x deposit rah rah rah but I just want what we are owed and move on. They have thrown in a bit of a moral dilemma though and have said what about all the other tenants and it only takes it for him to go bankrupt for them all to lose their deposits too. OOOH one for the weekly email lol!!
 As you seem to have a good relationship with your landlord, I'd be inclined to e-mail him asking to confirm that your deposit is with the TDS as per your tenancy agreement as they seem to have no record? This is a a polite first indication to him you are aware that he has broken the law, without actually saying it outright.Declutterbug-in-progress.⭐️⭐️⭐️ ⭐️⭐️0
- 
            Thanks FF. May just do that :A :A
 0
- 
            Some valid points made here guys with regards to the deposit. Nikki, you should have got a certificate to prove that your deposit had been registered with one of the three schemes.
 The fact that he hasn't registered it, does give you an option to claim back your deposit in full and a 3 x fine on top. However as your landlord has confirmed the above, and the fact that you may need a reference from him in the future...you'd probably be better off just taking the deposit back. ;-)0
- 
            I don't want any hassle of small claims courts unnecessarily so I am going to see if I get the deposit (minus reasonable deductions if any of course) back before pursuing.
 Thanks all!:A
 0
This discussion has been closed.
            Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
 
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

 
         