We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Can a director of a limited company be held personally liable for debt?

I have a tribunal award judgment against my former employer, but they haven't paid. The directors did not co-operate with the tribunal process and have now applied for the company to be struck off the register. This has been suspended though as an objection has been raised. Although the money could be chased through the county court, this seems pointless as the company was a sham, the director knew what he was doing and knows how to cover his tracls and the company has no assets, etc. Does anyone know if the director could be held personally liable for the payment as he was knowingly trading insolvently?


Thanks for any advice.

Comments

  • CIS
    CIS Posts: 12,260 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    There are cases in which the directors can be held liable for debts incurred by a limited company but you would need a solicitor who specialises in business law(or an accountant) to advise you further.
    I no longer work in Council Tax Recovery but instead work as a specialist Council Tax paralegal assisting landlords and Council Tax payers with council tax disputes and valuation tribunals. My views are my own reading of the law and you should always check with the local authority in question.
  • Anihilator
    Anihilator Posts: 2,169 Forumite
    Directors if trading knowingly whilst insolvent can become liable however as said you really would need to go for specialist advice.
  • Sadly not in this case.
  • Sadly not in this case.

    Did you want to supply some info to back that up?

    Fraudulent trading is one of the only reasons for lifting the veil whereby directors can become personally liable for debts of the business. The problem is proving this which can be a tricky and expensive business!
    Thinking critically since 1996....
  • Tozer
    Tozer Posts: 3,518 Forumite
    Did you want to supply some info to back that up?

    Fraudulent trading is one of the only reasons for lifting the veil whereby directors can become personally liable for debts of the business. The problem is proving this which can be a tricky and expensive business!

    For a start, fraudulent trading is extremely difficult to actually prove as you rightly say.

    It sounds as though the situation here is that the company has become insolvent after the Tribunal award. That isn't in itself evidence of wrongful or fraudulent trading.

    What may be more relevant is to determine the type of winding up. If it is a solvent voluntary winding-up, then, if there is an unsatisfied award to be paid, the directors cannot sign the necessary statutory declaration as to solvency.
  • Tozer wrote: »

    It sounds as though the situation here is that the company has become insolvent after the Tribunal award. That isn't in itself evidence of wrongful or fraudulent trading.

    What may be more relevant is to determine the type of winding up. If it is a solvent voluntary winding-up, then, if there is an unsatisfied award to be paid, the directors cannot sign the necessary statutory declaration as to solvency.

    Hi,

    Thanks to all who've commented.

    Just to clarify on a couple of points made...One of the reasons I made the tribunal claim was that the director did not pay staff, nor make them redundant or dismiss them so as to avoid redundancy payments, etc. The company did not have a bank account, the director was funding it personally and then decided to pull the plug. To my knowledge, no sales invoices were raised during the time staff were there, although the director bought goods and services, which, as far as I know he also didn't pay. He knowingly allowed staff to continue working for him without the means, so he said, to pay wages. Staff had been transferred to the company via TUPE from a previous company of which the said director of the new company was also a director, so, on paper, the company was solvent, yet in reality, it had no money.

    The director has applied for the company to be struck off, although this has been suspended.
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    I really think you need to take professional legal advice in this specialised area.
  • Brodie wrote: »
    Hi,

    Thanks to all who've commented.

    Just to clarify on a couple of points made...One of the reasons I made the tribunal claim was that the director did not pay staff, nor make them redundant or dismiss them so as to avoid redundancy payments, etc. The company did not have a bank account, the director was funding it personally and then decided to pull the plug. To my knowledge, no sales invoices were raised during the time staff were there, although the director bought goods and services, which, as far as I know he also didn't pay. He knowingly allowed staff to continue working for him without the means, so he said, to pay wages. Staff had been transferred to the company via TUPE from a previous company of which the said director of the new company was also a director, so, on paper, the company was solvent, yet in reality, it had no money.

    The director has applied for the company to be struck off, although this has been suspended.

    If he has applied for it to be struck off then the chances are it is a voluntary winding up. You need to check with Companies House Webcheck service.
  • pmduk
    pmduk Posts: 10,712 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    It might be worth listening to last Sundays McIntyre investigates on five live. Available via iplayer or podcast. There was a lawyer talking about a similar situation.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.6K Life & Family
  • 262K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.