Quick question DEO

AsknAnswer2

I'm almost sure I read somewhere that it is now a criminal offence when an NRP with a DEO in place fails to inform the CSA of a change of employer (CSA2) in order to evade paying child support.

Is there any truth in this?

Found_true_love

AsknAnswer2 wrote: »

I'm almost sure I read somewhere that it is now a criminal offence when an NRP with a DEO in place fails to inform the CSA of a change of employer (CSA2) in order to evade paying child support.

Is there any truth in this?

I believe that is in the new rules that and it is also mandatory to notify of a change of address within 7 days "or you may be committing a criminal offence"

AsknAnswer2

Think I've found it: SI Child Support amendments 2008 amends section 15 of the child support act 1992

That right?

DUTR

Found_true_love wrote: »

I believe that is in the new rules that and it is also mandatory to notify of a change of address within 7 days "or you may be committing a criminal offence"

What are they going to do? Lock him up?
They will just have to go through the process again, sorry

CSA_Help

AsknAnswer2 wrote: »

I'm almost sure I read somewhere that it is now a criminal offence when an NRP with a DEO in place fails to inform the CSA of a change of employer (CSA2) in order to evade paying child support.

Is there any truth in this?

Possibly is it not an adminstative offence of up to £1000 to fail to notify them .

"If you fail to give us the information we need , or you give us information that you know is false ,we can take you to court and you could be fined up to £1000.This applies to any person or organisation who, by law, must give us information -such as employers and accountants as well as parents."

Quoted straight from the book

Never heard of anyone going to court for this though ?

Maybe someone else could enlighten you

speedster

CSA_Help wrote: »

Possibly is it not an adminstative offence of up to £1000 to fail to notify them .

"If you fail to give us the information we need , or you give us information that you know is false ,we can take you to court and you could be fined up to £1000.This applies to any person or organisation who, by law, must give us information -such as employers and accountants as well as parents."

Quoted straight from the book

Never heard of anyone going to court for this though ?

Maybe someone else could enlighten you

they can, but it's a whole lot of hassle and in reality it's just another of their bully boy tactics.

this pathetic "not fit for purpose" agency rely on bullying, empty threats and illegal actions to meet their targets for the bosses bonus'.

CSA_Help

speedster wrote: »

they can, but it's a whole lot of hassle and in reality it's just another of their bully boy tactics.

this pathetic "not fit for purpose" agency rely on bullying, empty threats and illegal actions to meet their targets for the bosses bonus'.

Exactly

Now i'm bullying them and calling the shots so hopefully my DEO will get scrubbed tomorrow as i believe the pwc has been paid too much (see other post) :T

AsknAnswer2

Can't ask a question on here without people detracting from the question asked and hijacking an OP. I asked a question which required a straightforward and factual answer, I didn't ask for people's personal opinions of the CSA or whether being a criminal offence is "morally" right.

I did not indicate whether this was to do with an ongoing case, (which it isn't) nor did I indicate that an NRP must be a "he" which isn't always the case. Who said anything about a PWC being a "she" or about any court order in place? I know I didn't, so goodness only knows how those all came into the equation of the question I put.

There is plenty of room on the forum for others to do that, please have some respect for other members and use that space for discussion if you so wish, rather than taking over a thread entirely. Thank you.

CSA_Help

CSA_Help wrote: »

"If you fail to give us the information we need , or you give us information that you know is false ,we can take you to court and you could be fined up to £1000.This applies to any person or organisation who, by law, must give us information -such as employers and accountants as well as parents."

Sorry you feel this way then

Other forum users are only telling you of their experiences of the CSA .

If you don't understand the statement in bold go and seek legal advice and maybe not criticise other users of the forum

Page 18 of booklet CSA2034 issued with the DEO
Published Aug 2009 ISBN: 978-1-84763-529-7

Hope this helps

AsknAnswer2

I can understand it perfectly thank you. I was looking for the SI amendment to the Act (if it existed, which it does) as part of a course I am doing which is why I am not interested in experiences; I'm interested in the legal side of it, the wording of the acts not the policies or guides, and not the morals which is why I asked here as I am aware CSA employees post here and would probably be able to point me in the right direction.

If I want experiences I have my own and can find others by looking round the boards.

I'm fully aware of how shoddy the business is, but that is not what I asked about.

CSA_Help

AsknAnswer2 wrote: »

I can understand it perfectly thank you. I was looking for the SI amendment to the Act (if it existed, which it does) as part of a course I am doing which is why I am not interested in experiences; I'm interested in the legal side of it, the wording of the acts not the policies or guides, and not the morals which is why I asked here as I am aware CSA employees post here and would probably be able to point me in the right direction.

If I want experiences I have my own and can find others by looking round the boards.

I'm fully aware of how shoddy the business is, but that is not what I asked about.

If you are looked for specific ammendments of the act you should have mentioned that in the post

Try NACSA they are very clued up on the CSA even better than some that work there .Costs you £50 subscription .