We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Guarantor for Renting
Comments
-
Tassotti wrote:Most Landlords will issue an AST where both tenants are 'joint and severably liable' for the rent.
Which makes it all the more odd that one tenant needs a guarantor. If one fails to pay, then the other is liable.
However, will a Landlord insist on a joint tenancy? Why can't the AST be issued in the name of one only e.g. Glitterati's partner, who is working and appears to have no need for a guarantor.Affordability definitely comes into it. Also, the affordability of the guarantor will be taken into account.
I think we're talking about different things. By affordability, I meant that Landlords do not look at the joint budget - just salary. Income, of course, is only part of the picture - it might prove you can afford the rent, but it doesn't prove you can afford the rent on top of all the other bills.
RegardsWarning ..... I'm a peri-menopausal axe-wielding maniac
0 -
Debt_Free_Chick wrote:However, will a Landlord insist on a joint tenancy? Why can't the AST be issued in the name of one only e.g. Glitterati's partner, who is working and appears to have no need for a guarantor.
When my son was renting I said that I would only guarantee his share of the rent or all of it if it was a single tenancy. I was told by the estate agent that if his girlfriend was living in the property with him she HAD to be named on the tenancy.0 -
This is really interesting. Me and my OH have been given notice by our landlord that he wants to sell up. We are placing a holding deposit tomorrow on a place we have found but we are really paranoid about the checks they do. We are renting privately at the mo and landlord never did any checks but the house we like is through a letting agent so they will do checks. Problem is my OH has just graduated and doesnt start new job teacher training until september. I earn pretty well but both of us have to be checked seperately and we are worried OH's check will not be too good. He's working part time though, do you think we will need a guarantor?0
-
Debt_Free_Chick wrote:Which makes it all the more odd that one tenant needs a guarantor. If one fails to pay, then the other is liable.
However, will a Landlord insist on a joint tenancy? Why can't the AST be issued in the name of one only e.g. Glitterati's partner, who is working and appears to have no need for a guarantor.
I think we're talking about different things. By affordability, I meant that Landlords do not look at the joint budget - just salary. Income, of course, is only part of the picture - it might prove you can afford the rent, but it doesn't prove you can afford the rent on top of all the other bills.
Because the other tenant is then a 'permitted occupier'. If the tenant that pays the rent moves out, the LL is left with effectively a squatter who cannot pay the rent
The credit checks take this into account. The checks not only look at bad credit reports but also affordability. ie a certain amount of income needs to be required for a certail level of rent.0 -
enor wrote:We're in the process of renting a house at the moment. We had to give my salary details on the application form and because they are quite low, we have had to have a guarantor before even the credit checks have been done.
We only paid one set of fees though. So we haven't paid any extra for more credit checks to be done on the Guarantor though! So perhaps this is included in the first lot of fees or they not going to credit check us at all?
If the tenant referencing company requires a guarantor, then they do not charge extra for the first one. If this guarantor also fails the checks, a second guarantor will be needed, which is charged for.0 -
As a landlady, i am much more concerned with finding "surprises" on my credit checks of prospective tenants. I tend to say to prospective tenants, that i would much rather know about a finance difficulty they may have had in the past (we all get into muddles from time to time), and i am more interested in them having found a solution to their muddles. I also explain i prefer honesty on the application form, as a discharged old debt is not a worry - as long as i know about it ! its when prospective tenants hide things and lie that i start to worry about what else they may have lied about.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.6K Life & Family
- 259.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards