We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

End of QE

Forgive me if this is being discussed elsewhere...but surely the biggie story of the day, and I couldn't spot it on here.

Thoughts, everyone?What will happen now...?

We seem to be in one of those interesting pause moments, when everyone stops and looks to see what's going to happen next.

Pause may last till after the election. And then... :question:
«13456710

Comments

  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    carolt wrote: »
    Forgive me if this is being discussed elsewhere...but surely the biggie story of the day, and I couldn't spot it on here.

    Thoughts, everyone?What will happen now...?

    We seem to be in one of those interesting pause moments, when everyone stops and looks to see what's going to happen next.

    Pause may last till after the election. And then... :question:

    Isn't it it the classic 'take the stabilisers off the bike' moment? I guess two scenarios are possible when you remove the stablilisers: a) the kid isn't ready to cope on two wheels, the bike falls over and the kid smashes their face in, or b) the kid carries on biking (maybe with a bit of an initial wobble) and rides off happily down the street not needing any support.

    Oh, and just incase anyone needs help - bears support a) and bulls support b). Because it is just that clear cut.
  • Dan:_4
    Dan:_4 Posts: 3,795 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    carolt wrote: »
    Forgive me if this is being discussed elsewhere...but surely the biggie story of the day, and I couldn't spot it on here.

    Thoughts, everyone?What will happen now...?

    We seem to be in one of those interesting pause moments, when everyone stops and looks to see what's going to happen next.

    Pause may last till after the election. And then... :question:

    Nothing will happen.

    And after a few months I will enjoy resurfacing all those posts about QE temporary maintaining house prices, and they will crash the second it's withdrawn rubbish.
  • System
    System Posts: 178,371 Community Admin
    10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    The QE has stopped but the money is still in the system. I'd only expect a change is the money was also being withdrawn
    This is a system account and does not represent a real person. To contact the Forum Team email forumteam@moneysavingexpert.com
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Dan: wrote: »
    Nothing will happen.

    And after a few months I will enjoy resurfacing all those posts about QE temporary maintaining house prices, and they will crash the second it's withdrawn rubbish.

    I understand the concept of QE, but I can't really see the link between money creation and that keeping house prices high (I'm not saying there isn't a link, just that I don't get how there could be one. Maybe someone can explain).

    I kinda understand more how QE helps banks and the general financial market to buy assets, which boosts the financial markets, so maybe this is the link in a roundabout way? Seems a bit tenuous, but as I say, maybe someone can explain it to me.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Joeskeppi wrote: »
    The QE has stopped but the money is still in the system. I'd only expect a change is the money was also being withdrawn

    Isn't the key that the money created by QE has to be re-paid? And presumably this needs to come through some pretty severe tax hikes or public spending cuts? As an effect of this people have less money in their pocket, unemployment may rise and as a by-product the appetite to take on big loans to buy big houses isn't as strong as it was previously.

    Although I enjoy discussions like this, I am acutely aware of how out of my depth I am. Think I might pop in to The Arms and start a thread about who would win in a fight between a toddler with a knife and a drunk, angry cat. Or something.
  • Radiantsoul
    Radiantsoul Posts: 2,096 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Cleaver wrote: »
    I understand the concept of QE, but I can't really see the link between money creation and that keeping house prices high (I'm not saying there isn't a link, just that I don't get how there could be one. Maybe someone can explain).

    I kinda understand more how QE helps banks and the general financial market to buy assets, which boosts the financial markets, so maybe this is the link in a roundabout way? Seems a bit tenuous, but as I say, maybe someone can explain it to me.

    QE increases the amount of cash that banks have. And as banks have more money to lend and they will lend more to people as mortgages. This will result in an increase in the demand for housing and hence a rise in prices.
  • aelitaman
    aelitaman Posts: 522 Forumite
    QE increases the amount of cash that banks have. And as banks have more money to lend and they will lend more to people as mortgages. This will result in an increase in the demand for housing and hence a rise in prices.

    If they did this then I agree. But they did not as the previous thread on net mortgage lending highlighted. The banks just put the cash on deposit at the BoE earning interest.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    QE increases the amount of cash that banks have. And as banks have more money to lend and they will lend more to people as mortgages. This will result in an increase in the demand for housing and hence a rise in prices.

    That seems to make sense, thanks.

    I guess the simple economist in me wants to ask whether mortgages really dried up that much to the point where QE had a significant impact? I know there was a stage where some 10% deposit and some other FTB products disappeared, and I know sub-prime products are not really available anymore, but for most standard borrowers hasn't there been available products all the way through the recession?
  • Thrugelmir
    Thrugelmir Posts: 89,546 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Cleaver wrote: »
    I understand the concept of QE, but I can't really see the link between money creation and that keeping house prices high (I'm not saying there isn't a link, just that I don't get how there could be one. Maybe someone can explain).

    I kinda understand more how QE helps banks and the general financial market to buy assets, which boosts the financial markets, so maybe this is the link in a roundabout way? Seems a bit tenuous, but as I say, maybe someone can explain it to me.

    QE has allowed the Government to continue to borrow money without tapping the money markets or raising taxes. So people have more money in their pockets than they otherwise would, so are able to buy assets if they so wish , with the added advantage that interest rates are low if they can borrow the money.

    So this tax year around £180 billion has been added to the UK's credit card. All of which will be paid back in the future.
  • Cleaver
    Cleaver Posts: 6,989 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Thrugelmir wrote: »
    QE has allowed the Government to continue to borrow money without tapping the money markets or raising taxes. So people have more money in their pockets than they otherwise would, so are able to buy assets if they so wish , with the added advantage that interest rates are low if they can borrow the money.

    So this tax year around £180 billion has been added to the UK's credit card. All of which will be paid back in the future.

    Thanks Thrugel, I pretty much thought that was the case.

    However, if we pay that money back over the next decade or two via increased taxes and public spending cuts will this really be a catalyst for a sudden, large tumble in house prices over the next year or two? It just sounds more as though house prices won't be allowed to spiral up and up like they have over recent years if that scenario plays out.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.4K Life & Family
  • 258.8K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.