We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Car accident passenger claim, go to court?!

vsas
Posts: 1 Newbie
Hi,
here it is: November 2008 I was back seat passenger in a car that was hit by a vehicle coming from the opposing direction. 100% liability accepted by the other driver. As a result of the accident I hit my head in the front seat and I had a 15 mm cut just below my right eyebrow, a 4-5 cm bruise on my forehead (which then went down and cover all my face in blue-purplish-green for at least a month and now has left a whitish scare just below the hair line), a broken incisor and two damaged front teeth (just the surface). I could not remember if I was wearing a seat belt or not because of the head trauma, but most likely not, considering the injuries. I recovered the injuries, fixed teeth and I have two scares in my face (eyebrow and forehead) which are visible at chatting distance since I have short hair. I got a solicitor that worked with the insurance company of the driver of the car, since it seems really easy at the monent. I went to see a general practicioner and a dental expert selected by the solicitor company to complete a medical report (which took almost a year!). Now with all documents in hands my solitor has evaluated my damaged in this way: compensation 6500-8500£, finalcial loss 3700£. So a Part36 offer has been made to the other party insurance company of 12000£. The OS has rejected the offer and they are offering me 5300£ for compensation and 3700£ for financial loss, plus they will take off the 15% from the total because most likely I wasn't wearing a seatbealt. My solicitor says I should not accept because it's still too low and the prospective it's now to go to court. My question: How do I know that the right evaluation of my damage has been made by my solitor and not by the OS? Is it worth going to court? what should i do? please suggestions!! :-) thanks a lot!!
here it is: November 2008 I was back seat passenger in a car that was hit by a vehicle coming from the opposing direction. 100% liability accepted by the other driver. As a result of the accident I hit my head in the front seat and I had a 15 mm cut just below my right eyebrow, a 4-5 cm bruise on my forehead (which then went down and cover all my face in blue-purplish-green for at least a month and now has left a whitish scare just below the hair line), a broken incisor and two damaged front teeth (just the surface). I could not remember if I was wearing a seat belt or not because of the head trauma, but most likely not, considering the injuries. I recovered the injuries, fixed teeth and I have two scares in my face (eyebrow and forehead) which are visible at chatting distance since I have short hair. I got a solicitor that worked with the insurance company of the driver of the car, since it seems really easy at the monent. I went to see a general practicioner and a dental expert selected by the solicitor company to complete a medical report (which took almost a year!). Now with all documents in hands my solitor has evaluated my damaged in this way: compensation 6500-8500£, finalcial loss 3700£. So a Part36 offer has been made to the other party insurance company of 12000£. The OS has rejected the offer and they are offering me 5300£ for compensation and 3700£ for financial loss, plus they will take off the 15% from the total because most likely I wasn't wearing a seatbealt. My solicitor says I should not accept because it's still too low and the prospective it's now to go to court. My question: How do I know that the right evaluation of my damage has been made by my solitor and not by the OS? Is it worth going to court? what should i do? please suggestions!! :-) thanks a lot!!
0
Comments
-
Only you can decide if you think your injury is worth £5300 or the £6500-8500 you were told they were expecting and if the extra money is worth the hassle of going to court.
There is a published guide on what an injury settlement is (on average) but it is fairly vague (eg simply says male facial scaring rather than differentiating between a 1cm small white line and a full massive facial scaring you would get if a victim of a strong acid being sprayed into your face - for example)All posts made are simply my own opinions and are neither professional advice nor the opinions of my employers
No Advertising or Links in Signatures by Site Rules - MSE Forum Team 20 -
Take the advice of your solicitor.
"Going to court" doesn't necessarily mean an actual hearing will take place - the defendant can (and usually does) continue to negotiate right up to the actual hearing.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 349.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 452.9K Spending & Discounts
- 242.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 619.4K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.3K Life & Family
- 255.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards