We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
The new templates...
Comments
-
I probably received charges first when I was around 18 but the bank history I have only goes back to 2002 maybe 2001 without having it with me to check.0
-
I do feel quite strongly that now the waiver is no more, then claims where hardship was historically a problem but currently isnt, actually should be quite a strong argument to show the imbalance required under 5(1) and the unfair relationship under the CCA. Also in the ''human'' argument letters the bank breached the banking code over and over again which surely is an argument you can put forwards to the bank and to the FOS. Worth discussing anyway?LegalBeagles0
![[Deleted User]](https://us-noi.v-cdn.net/6031891/uploads/defaultavatar/nFA7H6UNOO0N5.jpg)
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.6K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards