We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

3D TV - Prices and Reviews

Options
Anyone have any idea about the prices for the new range of 3d TVs being launched.

I know the Sony L series is due to launch in March, but there seems to be very little in the way of reviews or prices for any 3d TVs.

Appreciate any feedback from anyone on the know :-)
«1

Comments

  • jaydeeuk1
    jaydeeuk1 Posts: 7,714 Forumite
    Debt-free and Proud!
    Expensive, pointless and won't catch on. Although I'm sure someone once said that about Radio, cars, computers etc...
  • Dave101t
    Dave101t Posts: 4,157 Forumite
    i dont understand why 3d cant be projected through a standard HDTV, afterall they all do 60fps interlaced or progressive, simple interlace the coloured images and wear the specs!
    price: probs 1000 pounds for the 1st adopters, like hdtv was
    Target Savings by end 2009: 20,000
    current savings: 20,500 (target hit yippee!)
    Debts: 8000 (student loan so doesnt count)

    new target savings by Feb 2010: 30,000
  • lfc321
    lfc321 Posts: 711 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    Tons of early reviews of the Sony 3D TVs if you google 'Sony 3D TV'. Good piece on this on Guardian technology site today. It quotes prices of £2500 for the TVs that Sky are backing and £5000+ for the Phillips version. Not sure where those figures are from though. http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/2009/jan/22/3d-television

    I won't be bothering for a long time. For one there's bound to be a format war. And I'm not in a rush to sit in my living room wearing stupid glasses.
  • Dave101t wrote: »
    i dont understand why 3d cant be projected through a standard HDTV, afterall they all do 60fps interlaced or progressive, simple interlace the coloured images and wear the specs!
    price: probs 1000 pounds for the 1st adopters, like hdtv was

    To be honest I am a little confused with that aswell. Why can televisin channels broadcast 3d TV to our normal sets, but we need special 3d tvs moving forward.

    Also Something which threw me today was that I read the 3d specs, are not like the ones you get at the cinema. The Sony ones have batteries in them and apparently actively change.... does anyone have any idea about that... is this a model that all will adopt, or is it sony trying to sell you 3d specs at an inflated price?
  • ali137
    ali137 Posts: 374 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 23 January 2010 at 1:10AM
    just wait for this:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bBv_RPit_xI

    No 3D Glasses Needed

    The tv which you have to wear glasses, will be old technology like hd will be. I bloody spent £2000:mad: on a sony TV 2 years ago.
  • edgex
    edgex Posts: 4,212 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Anyone have any idea about the prices for the new range of 3d TVs being launched.

    I know the Sony L series is due to launch in March, but there seems to be very little in the way of reviews or prices for any 3d TVs.

    Appreciate any feedback from anyone on the know :-)


    theres also extremely little in the way of tv's, transmission facilities or content
    :rotfl:
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    jaydeeuk1 wrote: »
    Expensive, pointless and won't catch on. Although I'm sure someone once said that about Radio, cars, computers etc...

    it may well be right that it wont catch on simply because of how slow they have been to push high definition. the majority of tv channels are still in sd and most of what we see on hd channels is just sd upscaled isnt it?...rather than actually having been filmed in hd. of course that point is directed at stuff made recently because it would be unfair to direct it at stuff made before hd even existed.
    my underlying point is if tv and film makers are still seeing hd as too expensive then i cant see them embrassing 3d.
  • donnajunkie
    donnajunkie Posts: 32,412 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    ali137 wrote: »
    will be old technology like hd will be.

    i saw a ultra hd tv in a programme from the ces show recently. the tv was 4000 by 2000 i think as opposed to the current 1900 by 1080 that hd is now.
  • roddydogs
    roddydogs Posts: 7,479 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Most programmes are not yet in HD, so how many are going to be in 3D?
  • roddydogs wrote: »
    Most programmes are not yet in HD, so how many are going to be in 3D?
    All of them? I'm no good at tests :rotfl:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.