We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Offering on a house with tenants in situ
Comments
-
If the tenant has been there for many years and the contract signed isn't an AST, then they may be a regulated tenant who have been in place before the housing legislation changed and are virtually unevictable - regulated tenants have strong protection from eviction.
For those with ASTs, they cannot be evicted during the fixed term (unless they have substantial arrears of 2 plus months), must be served with 2 months notice (this can run along side the fixed term), might take a month or so to reach court, might take a month or so to get a bailiff to evict them if they refuse to leave after a Possession Order is awarded to the landlord in court and the tenant refuses to leave. It can be a long process...0 -
you run the risk of paying a second set of valuation fees if the sale drags on as most mortgage offers only last 6 months then lenders want a new valuation fee..
i would not exchange until the tenant left, as you could then drop your offer if she has damaged the property0 -
You sound determined to get the place, but determined only to commit to £100. I think you need to be prepared to put up more to get it - or to walk away..ruggedtoast wrote: »Basically what I want - is to put in an offer, have them take it off the market, but without my actually having to commit to more than £100 of legal or mortgage set up fees until I am personally satisfied that the tenant has left.
In your position, I would think about seeing the tenant and assessing what the issue really is. You could consider cutting in some sort of sweetner to the tenant - but don't do that when or if you see them.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0 -
I dont think the tenant is approachable. She has agreed to a few viewings in the past but has, apparently, been very aggressive towards people when they arrive - and said all sorts of negative stuff about the house. This was before the first buyers were found.
After that sale fell through she has since been served a Section 21 - refused to leave and refused to allow any more viewings.
She has apparently now agreed for access for one afternoon only which is why the agent has arranged the block viewings.
As I understand it she came to the end of her tenancy and was given a Section 21 but hasnt left and says she wont leave. So they will have to evict her. I'm not sure if shes still paying rent or not.
I'm wondering what I could reasonably offer them to get them to take it off the market without committing to expensive pre-sale proceedings that could easily be ballsed up by the tenant not leaving or trashing the place.
Also what legal checks would I have to ensure have been taken to ensure that the vendor has evicted the tenant, and not just pretended they have but actually left her in there.
For what its worth I rent myself and dont agree with selling properties you have tenants in - I think you should vacate them first and then sell - but this is basically a separate issue0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.5K Life & Family
- 261.7K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards