We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
PCN appeal failure. Can I appeal again?
Comments
-
Thanks Coupon-mad.
If you say so, but I just have a hard time believing the signs are unlawul. To quote from PePiPooThe taxi rank signage is not prescribed within the TSRGD 2002. It is highly unlikely the council has been given authority to use those signs as there is no need to deviate from the taxi signage that the TSRGD 2002 does prescribe. In your next appeal advise the council that the taxi rank signage is unlawful as it is neither prescribed nor authorised as required by section 64 of the RTRA 1984.
andJust got around to looking at the photos the upright signs are not a parking 'restriction' they are to indicate where taxis may ply for trade you have a 99.99% chance of winning this if you appeal properly.
I'm sure these chaps are 'spot-on' with their analysis (and I have a lot of respect for them), but for a two brain cell drone like me, it seems too good to be true. I'm still wading through the TSRGD 2002 (not a very good plot. Characters are a bit mundane). It's hard to know how to argue whe you're not an expert. :rotfl:
Still, onwards and upwards.
Azimuth990 -
They will help you all you need. Always [ut a draft appeal onsite and they will advise.I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
Pepipoo posters know what they are talking about and they get the majority of posters off their PCNs on technicalities like these.
It's a really common appeal, LOTS of signs and lines are wrong all over the Country. Whenever I visit my local city centre, almost every parking bay I see is non-compliant, and the Council has done nothing about it for years. I never knew this until I got to reading about bays/lines and signs on pepipoo threads, regular posters begin to see a pattern and can spot some errors easily now.
If you have time then read a few other threads on there, you'll see they normally find a get-out clause. Or read some of the successes reported on the sticky thread at the top of their parking/decriminalised notices forum.
The Council won't want to test a dodgy sign and dodgy taxi rank with the adjudicator, as it could render hundreds of other PCNs unenforceable as well. So they'll probably string you along with refusals in the hope you'll give up, and then fold. Stay determined to see it through I reckon.
The most you'd be ordered to pay if you lost with the adjudicator would be the undiscounted ticket cost so it's worth contesting almost any Council PCN if you can, I know I would in future.
PRIVATE 'PCN'? DON'T PAY BUT DON'T IGNORE IT (except N.Ireland).
CLICK at the top or bottom of any page where it says:
Home»Motoring»Parking Tickets Fines & Parking - read the NEWBIES THREAD0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
