Ready, steady… save!
You don’t need a chart to join in. Here are 2 ways to record your savings:
1. Cross it off
Pop a chart into your first post. Saved an amount? Cross it out! Read more »
£0.01 £0.02 £0.03
2. Write it down
Skip the chart and add updates to your first post. Read more »
“Another +£3 saved today. Go me!”
Use +£ before each new saving so it counts towards your total.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
3d glasses question
donnajunkie
Posts: 32,414
Forumite
in Techie Stuff
hi,
i saw avatar 3d recently. as the glasses seem to be better than those card board things with the coloured lenses i hoped they would perform better with 3d blu ray films. they dont work at all with them though. how come?
i saw avatar 3d recently. as the glasses seem to be better than those card board things with the coloured lenses i hoped they would perform better with 3d blu ray films. they dont work at all with them though. how come?
0
Comments
-
A 3D film is actually projected two-fold (one for each eye) and the 3D glasses split the hybrid image back into left & right eyes. The "old" way to do this was using colour filtered glasses, but nowadays, each of the two images is projected through a polarising filer, and the filers as set at 90degrees to each other. The glasses are also polarising filters which will only let through the appropriately polarised image.
In either case, there is no way that a "normal" image e.g. on a TV etc can be split to form a 3D images - simply because there is only a single image source.Chris Elvin0 -
donnajunkie wrote: »hi,
i saw avatar 3d recently. as the glasses seem to be better than those card board things with the coloured lenses i hoped they would perform better with 3d blu ray films. they dont work at all with them though. how come?
So you stole the glasses?
:idea:0 -
A 3D film is actually projected two-fold (one for each eye) and the 3D glasses split the hybrid image back into left & right eyes. The "old" way to do this was using colour filtered glasses, but nowadays, each of the two images is projected through a polarising filer, and the filers as set at 90degrees to each other. The glasses are also polarising filters which will only let through the appropriately polarised image.
In either case, there is no way that a "normal" image e.g. on a TV etc can be split to form a 3D images - simply because there is only a single image source.
thanks for your explaination although i'm still a little confused.
i guess i thought they would work for watching my blu rays that are in 3d because i have often seen talk of people using better glasses than the glasses that are included with the blu rays.0 -
-
-
donnajunkie wrote: »

thanks for your explaination although i'm still a little confused.
i guess i thought they would work for watching my blu rays that are in 3d because i have often seen talk of people using better glasses than the glasses that are included with the blu rays.
You might be right, but these will be a variant of the red/blue (or whatever colours they choose) By combining two images with different colour filters, a normal TV can show 3D films. Unfortunately the technique of projecting separate (left & right eye) images used in Avatar is not color based, but uses polarising filters.
If 3D film makers all chose the came red/blue colour combination for their filters, then I can see that there might be a market for improved quality 3D specs. But I'm not sure whetehr there is such agreement, therefore each 3D film might need its own glassesChris Elvin0 -
I much prefer the polarising filters, as red/blue or red/green glasses don't work quite so well for me as I'm slightly colourblind (just ends up with the effect of two flat images).
Also, I think after they collect the used glasses, they clean and sterilise them before repackaging them.Squirrel!If I tell you who I work for, I'm not allowed to help you. If I don't say, then I can help you with questions and fixing products. Regardless, there's still no secret EU law.
Now 20% cooler0 -
I much prefer the polarising filters, as red/blue or red/green glasses don't work quite so well for me as I'm slightly colourblind (just ends up with the effect of two flat images).
Also, I think after they collect the used glasses, they clean and sterilise them before repackaging them.
I cant use the blue and red/yellow style glasses as i have trouble forgetting the fact im watching a movie in blue and red. even in a dark room with my lcd backlight on full and brightness full (making the image washed out) i still either see the movie in red or blue depending on what catches my eye more.
Thankgod they still release 2d versions alongside the 3d ones.Back by no demand whatsoever.0 -
4743hudsonj wrote: »I cant use the blue and red/yellow style glasses as i have trouble forgetting the fact im watching a movie in blue and red. even in a dark room with my lcd backlight on full and brightness full (making the image washed out) i still either see the movie in red or blue depending on what catches my eye more.
Thankgod they still release 2d versions alongside the 3d ones.
yeah, while the 3d effects can be good the colours dont look right. that is why i was hoping the glasses from the cinema would work and remove that problem. i've only got 2 3d blu rays and i mainly got them coz i fancied seeing films in 3d. i had not seen the films before. both are very average. journey to the centre of the earth has great 3d effects and is made worth watching by them. my bloody valentine has poor 3d effects and with it not being that good a film it is only just about watchable.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.9K Banking & Borrowing
- 255K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.2K Spending & Discounts
- 248.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 606.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards