We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

File Compression

Hi,

Does anyone know of any free file compression software.

OS: Vista 32-bit

Thanks
«1

Comments

  • HoofeHearted
    HoofeHearted Posts: 2,652 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    7-Zip is very good and free. :j
  • oldwiring
    oldwiring Posts: 2,452 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    FWIW Just-Zipit works for me.It's free also

    Something I remain ignorant of is whether some compress more effectively than others and likewise when re-uncompressed.. Thoughts on that?
  • MoneyMan
    MoneyMan Posts: 69 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    7-Zip is very good and free. :j

    Not impressed with 7-zip as it appears to increase the file size!!
  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    What are you trying to compress?

    Remember some file types like JPG are already compressed so trying to compress them again doesn't do anything.
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • John_Gray
    John_Gray Posts: 5,845 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    When PKZIP first came out (at the end of the 80s) there was some correspondence about compressing a file multiple times, to make it even smaller each time. This thread stopped abruptly when someone asked what would happen if you compressed the file so many times that there was only a single bit of data left? (And when people actually tried it, only to find a small overhead increase each time!).

    Now compression is virtually redundant, since disks are SO BIG...!
  • BillScarab
    BillScarab Posts: 6,027 Forumite
    John_Gray wrote: »
    When PKZIP first came out (at the end of the 80s) there was some correspondence about compressing a file multiple times, to make it even smaller each time. This thread stopped abruptly when someone asked what would happen if you compressed the file so many times that there was only a single bit of data left? (And when people actually tried it, only to find a small overhead increase each time!).

    Now compression is virtually redundant, since disks are SO BIG...!

    We still use compressed files a lot at work. When we building servers in remote locations and installing software it does save a fair bit of time in ftp'ing files around.

    I never use them at home anymore though.
    It's my problem, it's my problem
    If I feel the need to hide
    And it's my problem if I have no friends
    And feel I want to die


  • fermi
    fermi Posts: 40,542 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler
    John_Gray wrote: »
    When PKZIP first came out (at the end of the 80s) there was some correspondence about compressing a file multiple times, to make it even smaller each time. This thread stopped abruptly when someone asked what would happen if you compressed the file so many times that there was only a single bit of data left?

    Reminds me of the Homoeopathy nonsense. ;) :rotfl:
    Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB

    IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
  • savemoney
    savemoney Posts: 18,125 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts
    edited 7 January 2010 at 3:27PM
    You can compress jpegs, winzip has a algorithm just for them and can get around 20-30%

    download.php?file=toqa2ick8qinuekn0t7d.jpg


    BillScarab wrote: »
    What are you trying to compress?

    Remember some file types like JPG are already compressed so trying to compress them again doesn't do anything.
  • fermi
    fermi Posts: 40,542 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler
    BillScarab wrote: »
    We still use compressed files a lot at work. When we building servers in remote locations and installing software it does save a fair bit of time in ftp'ing files around.

    Indeed. Frequently accessed content and config files tend to be in uncompressed form.

    DL'ing source code for apps is another one. If it was not compressed (gzipped, bzipped or whatever) it would take much much longer.

    Linux kernel source. Normally 250 MB +. Compressed, 50-70 MB.
    Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB

    IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.2K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 258.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.