We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

When to clean up your credit file???

2»

Comments

  • fermi
    fermi Posts: 40,542 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker Rampant Recycler
    edited 8 January 2010 at 4:47PM
    Charco wrote: »
    The ICO cant ignore your complaint then though!

    Shouldn't, but they sometimes do.

    Saw a couple of cases last year where the ICO did not uphold the complaint since the data had not been disputed with the original creditor by the debtor. Apparently the CRA did not have to amend the data since the creditor had told them upon query that it was accurate. :rolleyes: And these were cases with evidence.

    One of those was on CAG I think (another site anyway) , and the other I was PM'd here about.

    I know it is bloooody daft, but there you go. :confused:

    That is why I still normally say to dispute with the OC in all cases, then perhaps with the CRA as well as a "belt and braces" approach.
    Free/impartial debt advice: National Debtline | StepChange Debt Charity | Find your local CAB

    IVA & fee charging DMP companies: Profits from misery, motivated ONLY by greed
  • Charco.

    ***PS HappyChappy - i hope you mean that that is good news coz it show progress in your credit rating, not because it means you can have those new shoes this weekend or that the champagne is on you!***

    Too right mate. Its for calm, considered credit rebuilding only. I was always quite good with my finances prior to the IVA, which only came about owing to protracted Family Courts action just to maintain contact (at my expense) with my son, as the ex got her fees courtesy of the tax payer so could be (and was) as obstructive and frivoulous as possible.

    Oh well, you live and learn I suppose.

    Besides, my tastes have never run to that of champagne lol.

    :beer:
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.