We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

On Sky Now... Iceland to refuse to pay UK 2.3 Billion to savers

2456713

Comments

  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    So what happened last time he didn't sign

    Ég l!ta !t eins og er s!rfræðingur ! Íslandi !!!!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • purch
    purch Posts: 9,865 Forumite
    Didn't Iceland end up winning the last Iceland vs UK wars

    On the away Haddock rule !!!!
    'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'
  • ruggedtoast
    ruggedtoast Posts: 9,819 Forumite
    I dont see what the problem is. Iceland borrowed a lot of money they had no way of paying back, and now they want the British tax payer to foot the bill.

    Brown should approve of this as it seems to fit his model of risk perfectly. Maybe he can semi nationalise Iceland and then pay the Icelandic government enormous bonuses to stop them defecting to Greenland.
  • Masomnia
    Masomnia Posts: 19,506 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    mbga9pgf wrote: »
    Looks as if the government has another 2.3 bill to find from somewhere

    The money will probably come from the FSCS, which means that it'll come from banks, building societies, IFAs, that kind of thing; members of the scheme. We end up paying either way!
    “I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Iceland borrowed a lot of money they had no way of paying back, and now they want the British tax payer to foot the bill.

    Icelandic banks borrowed a lot of money. There's a difference.
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    Masomnia wrote: »
    The money will probably come from the FSCS, which means that it'll come from banks, building societies, IFAs, that kind of thing; members of the scheme. We end up paying either way!
    Yep, and who owns the majority of the bank with the largest "asset" base?
  • ben500
    ben500 Posts: 23,192 Forumite
    Quelle surprise Rodney
    Four guns yet only one trigger prepare for a volley.


    Together we can make a difference.
  • tomterm8
    tomterm8 Posts: 5,892 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 5 January 2010 at 12:20PM
    Generali wrote: »
    According to this:

    http://brunnur.stjr.is/embassy/strasb.nsf/form/content.html?openForm&wt=4B0130332E30322E30342E3032004C01454E4700

    If the President doesn't sign the bill it doesn't become law from what I can see from my very quick skim reading.

    Didn't Iceland end up winning the last Iceland vs UK wars (the three Cod Wars link)

    The cod wars were a very limited affair, though, weren't they. In any case, it is unlikely that this would result in a war since both parties are Nato members.

    It is likely that any chance for iceland to join the EU or eurozone in the near future is kaput, and in fact since Iceland has renaged on certain aspects of EEA law, it is arguable that there is legal reason for it to be excluded from the EEA too. Further, it has broken the agreement with the IMF, and so technically should repay the loan immediatly.

    edit: peeps might be interested in then formal declaration http://english.forseti.is/media/PDF/10_01_05_declaration_w_sign.pdf . This decision doesn't mean what its reported to mean, the act has been refered to a referendum, it hasn't been vetoed.
    “The ideas of debtor and creditor as to what constitutes a good time never coincide.”
    ― P.G. Wodehouse, Love Among the Chickens
  • so the icelandic people do what is best for iceland. perhaps we could learn from this. perhaps the icelandic people would also like to create jobs and reduce unemployment in Yemen like Brown has pledged to do. He is awesome. Not only is the UK doing GREAT! he is now sorting out the Yemen as well.

    And like us, Yemen didn't vote for him either.
  • mbga9pgf
    mbga9pgf Posts: 3,224 Forumite
    edited 5 January 2010 at 12:25PM
    It would be cheaper to ahem, "decommission" our nuclear weapons stock there (yemen). Would instantly get rid of the terrorist and piracy issues that Gordy has his knickers in a twist about.

    A few extra jobs down the market isnt going to solve anything.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.