We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Sale Blocked by Potential Claim

13»

Comments

  • zzzLazyDaisy
    zzzLazyDaisy Posts: 12,497 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    edited 22 December 2009 at 1:27PM
    I am not sure that changing solicitors would help at this stage.

    If your buyers change solicitors, the first thing the new solicitors will do is to request the file from the current solicitors. They will then be on notice about the tree problem and will be under a duty to advise the buyers accordingly.

    In any event, the solicitor cannot prevent the buyer from proceeding with the sale, they are perfectly entitled to proceed against their solicitor's advice should they so wish (although imo there isn't much point in paying a solicitor and then ignoring their advice). Unless of course the lender is with-holding the mortgage offer until the issue is resolved?
    I'm a retired employment solicitor. Hopefully some of my comments might be useful, but they are only my opinion and not intended as legal advice.
  • I am not sure that changing solicitors would help at this stage.

    If your buyers change solicitors, the first thing the new solicitors will do is to request the file from the current solicitors. They will then be on notice about the tree problem and will be under a duty to advise the buyers accordingly.

    In any event, the solicitor cannot prevent the buyer from proceeding with the sale, they are perfectly entitled to proceed against their solicitor's advice should they so wish (although imo there isn't much point in paying a solicitor and then ignoring their advice). Unless of course the lender is with-holding the mortgage offer until the issue is resolved?
    The lender hasn't yet been told, apparently as a favour to both the estate agents and the buyers, perhaps in the hope that I would admit liability and the issue would no longer be a problem for my buyers and my neighbour. I haven't any idea what the claim will be for as yet or even if there will be one. Does anyone have any ideas how long a claim would normally take to be issued? Is there a way the process could be hurried up before the chain breaks down?
    Mandalena
    x
  • DVardysShadow
    DVardysShadow Posts: 18,949 Forumite
    I am not sure that changing solicitors would help at this stage.

    If your buyers change solicitors, the first thing the new solicitors will do is to request the file from the current solicitors. They will then be on notice about the tree problem and will be under a duty to advise the buyers accordingly.
    Assuming buyer's solicitor is playing straight here, that is true. However, I read it that buyer's solicitor is not necessarily passing on resolution options and is acting more for neighbour than buyer, so if buyer changed solicitor, it would stop neighbour calling the shots over the sale.
    Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 526 Forumite
    Do you know if your neighbour is actually insured? It appears odd to me that they have instructed a solicitor. I would have thought the first port of call would be their insurers who would in turn instruct solicitors if deemed necessary.

    If on the other hand they do not have a valid insurance policy, this might explain why they have instructed a solicitor and why they are so intent on getting you to admit liability.
  • Vincenzo wrote: »
    Do you know if your neighbour is actually insured? It appears odd to me that they have instructed a solicitor. I would have thought the first port of call would be their insurers who would in turn instruct solicitors if deemed necessary.

    If on the other hand they do not have a valid insurance policy, this might explain why they have instructed a solicitor and why they are so intent on getting you to admit liability.
    Thanks for your comments.
    This is exactly what I am wondering about. My neighbour is a personal friend of my buyer's solicitor, my solicitor has asked for details of my buyers insurance company and has not yet received them. It is unclear in what capacity the buyer's solicitor is acting although she has written that she is representing my neighbour, I believe the whole matter is being considered by her insurance company but my buyers think my neighbour has handled things badly with them from what they have learned from their solicitor.
    Mandalena
    x
  • dacouch
    dacouch Posts: 21,636 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    It is fairly difficult and unusual for a neighboor to be able to sue you for root damage, they have to demonstrate you are "Legally Liable". This in effect would mean you were aware your tree was causing damage and took no action and / or you did not take reasonable precautions eg did not maintain the tree
  • dacouch wrote: »
    It is fairly difficult and unusual for a neighboor to be able to sue you for root damage, they have to demonstrate you are "Legally Liable". This in effect would mean you were aware your tree was causing damage and took no action and / or you did not take reasonable precautions eg did not maintain the tree
    Thanks for the comment.
    I wasn't aware and the tree has been gently pruned, it is not very large, my neighbour complained when I pruned the nearby hedge which was blocking light from my windows. Just the fact that a possible claim is pending, very unjustly in my view, seems to be preventing me from selling my home. Even if the claim never materialises, which is quite probable, the delay will cause the chain to collapse unless there is an alternative solution to be found.
    Mandalena
    x
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 603.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.3K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.