We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
First time buyer... safe investment?
Pavel_S
Posts: 39 Forumite
Hi everyone,
I've made my final choice between two properties, one is in Bishops Itchington, another is in Mickleton in the Cotswolds.
Both are almost the same price (within 3%) and both have a lot of plus and minus points. My question is which is better in terms of an investment?
The house in Bishops Itchington is almost perfect, it is a 2 bedroom end terrace 100 year old cottage, with GCH, double glazing a conservatory and two double bedrooms. It needs no modernization whatsoever.
The one in Mickleton is a 2 bedroom terraced house, about 25 years old. It has single glazed windows, old storage heaters, needs a bit of a lick of paint, but has a very nice kitchen, has a wooden office-type outbuilding in its garden, and has a garage with light and power.
I realise that's a brief summary, but in terms of what's happening with prices, I would expect that the Mickleton house would be much easier to sell on in the future, even if it might not be the better one to live in at present.. Would its lack of GCH and Double glazing be a serious negative when it comes to selling it?
I'm just wondering how different these two would be in terms of investment.. Is a Glos postcode and Cotswolds location really a guarantee of price stability? (They seem to have decreased much less than in places in South Warks).
Cheers,
Pavel
I've made my final choice between two properties, one is in Bishops Itchington, another is in Mickleton in the Cotswolds.
Both are almost the same price (within 3%) and both have a lot of plus and minus points. My question is which is better in terms of an investment?
The house in Bishops Itchington is almost perfect, it is a 2 bedroom end terrace 100 year old cottage, with GCH, double glazing a conservatory and two double bedrooms. It needs no modernization whatsoever.
The one in Mickleton is a 2 bedroom terraced house, about 25 years old. It has single glazed windows, old storage heaters, needs a bit of a lick of paint, but has a very nice kitchen, has a wooden office-type outbuilding in its garden, and has a garage with light and power.
I realise that's a brief summary, but in terms of what's happening with prices, I would expect that the Mickleton house would be much easier to sell on in the future, even if it might not be the better one to live in at present.. Would its lack of GCH and Double glazing be a serious negative when it comes to selling it?
I'm just wondering how different these two would be in terms of investment.. Is a Glos postcode and Cotswolds location really a guarantee of price stability? (They seem to have decreased much less than in places in South Warks).
Cheers,
Pavel
0
Comments
-
Your question is unanswerable. The immediate surrounds make a tremendous difference as do the communities and the general locations. Schools too, but you are vulnerable to a change of Headmaster - schools can become unfashionable quickly. And the time-scale over which you consider the investment is also relevant.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
-
Is there such a thing as a "safe investment"? Even the price of gold can go down. Why not buy a lovely house that you want to be happy living in?0
-
I would not consider buying a modern house without DG & GCH unless the cost of adding these (plus the disruption) was factored into the price. How much will you need to spend on Mickleton to bring it up to standard (now add 40-50% as we always underestimate
). Does that cost plus asking price still make it reasonably priced?
DK why you think Mickelton would be easier to sell on if 1st one is almost perfect & certainly sounds more attractive
.
Go with the one your heart says.A positive attitude may not solve all your problems, but it will annoy enough people to make it worth the effort
Mortgage Balance = £0
"Do what others won't early in life so you can do what others can't later in life"0 -
Buy the property that you can see being a home in 15 years time.
Your current plans may be to move in five years, but plans can get scuppered and you can end up living in the same place for many years. This happened to me - and I am so happy that I bought a home, rather than a house, around fifteen years ago! That home is a smallish flat - but it is big enough for DH and I, and has been for all those fifteen years (I think it's actually been eighteen years).
We have nice neighbours, good parking, a huge kitchen for the size of the place, and whenever we've considered moving we've looked at around five or six properties and realised that it simply isn't worth the cost (both on the mortgage and actual moving costs) to leave our lovely, occasionally slightly too small flat.
I also just re-read the original post - I would never, ever, ever again buy a property with night storage heating unless I had the money to replace it on the day I moved in.
Julie0 -
I think the dilemma here is that the house in mickleton is in a place I'd like to live in, and has a garage (very important as I like to tinker with cars), but the actual house itself inside, the one I'd want to live in (and that is better fitted out etc.) is the one in bishops itchington.
That's what makes it difficult is that there's not one thats a sensible and one an intuitive choice, they're both a compromise, which is why I wanted to see what each one is like in terms of an investment (since I'll have to figure out for myself which one I want to live in most!)
Thanks everyone for your replies so far
Pavel0 -
OK, because you cannot decide in terms of your needs being met, you are looking at the investment potential. I would suggest that you refactor your requirements as needs and wants and you choose the one which meets all of your needs and most of your wants. Or you look further.Hi, we’ve had to remove your signature. If you’re not sure why please read the forum rules or email the forum team if you’re still unsure - MSE ForumTeam0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.4K Spending & Discounts
- 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 604K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.4K Life & Family
- 261.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards