PCN-UK Ltd

anewman

OMG! Can you believe these job advertisements?! (Well being PCN-UK Ltd we can I suppose, lol).

http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:e0H6L8Ao6yAJ:www.myjobsearch.com/company/PCN_UK_Limited/jobs.html+pcn-uk&cd=21&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

A job as a "Bailiff" working for pcn-uk limited :rotfl:

dacouch

Here is where he lives http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?hl=en&source=hp&q=PR7+2EZ&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hq=&hnear=Chorley,+Lancashire+PR7+2EZ&gl=uk&ei=faRXS9iJFYL40wTK0bz3BA&sa=X&oi=geocode_result&ct=image&resnum=1&ved=0CAkQ8gEwAA

spirit

anewman wrote: »

OMG! Can you believe these job advertisements?! (Well being PCN-UK Ltd we can I suppose, lol).

http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:e0H6L8Ao6yAJ:www.myjobsearch.com/company/PCN_UK_Limited/jobs.html+pcn-uk&cd=21&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

A job as a "Bailiff" working for pcn-uk limited :rotfl:

He might have been better off advertising for a web designer/manager.

thepearce

Perhaps it would be a good idea to create pages in the places where they were before :
eg www.pcn-uk.co.uk/ignore.htm - currently google shows the old version of "Q: What will happen now I've chosen to ignore my PCN?" - I think that it would be good to replace with something more truthful.

James_N

anewman wrote: »

OMG! Can you believe these job advertisements?! (Well being PCN-UK Ltd we can I suppose, lol).

http://66.102.9.132/search?q=cache:e0H6L8Ao6yAJ:www.myjobsearch.com/company/PCN_UK_Limited/jobs.html+pcn-uk&cd=21&hl=en&ct=clnk&gl=uk&client=firefox-a

A job as a "Bailiff" working for pcn-uk limited :rotfl:

Thanks for this post. Here we have a public body (job centre) advertising a job which is essentially illegal - you cannot "just" call yourself a bailiff a seize vehicles. Or am I wrong. Anyone able to advise?

dacouch

It's one of the many many mistakes PCN-UK made, I like the part where they say you may be called upon to seize or clamp a vehicle that owes them money. Knowing PCN-UK this would supposedly have been done without a court judgement.

They sent their "Bailiffs" around to Alpha Romeo's house (Who is a poster on MSE since the incident) and left a note saying they were bailiffs and had a warrant. They had no warrant as they had not obtained a court judgement. This is highly illegal for obvious reasons and makes you wonder how many other people they had played this trick on and the people had been scared so paid up

peter_the_piper

deleted at request of CES

HO87

A quick check around BPA member websites this morning reveals that very few, barely 10%, now display either the ICO or SIA logos but the blank spaces are still a little obvious on some of the websites. Some websites seem to have been stripped of all logos. One might think that some form of circular has been put around? There was also a surprisingly high number of websites currently under construction or temporarily down?

peter_the_piper

deleted at request of ces

HO87

It would seem that someone has already editted the wording of the "Permit letter". I'm not claiming responsibility though.