csa are going to take NRP maintenance without his consent

bungle4x4

atwitsend wrote: »

Orignally he told the CSA he was self employed (as he did my solicitors and his!) but a !!!! up by his family, meant two of his wage slips were left in my daughters change bag showing he was actually PAYE by the umbrella company, I have never done such a happy dance in all my life :rotfl: I gave the details to the CSA and they contacted the company who have given them all his wage details dating back to febuary, thats how the assesment was worked out saying he should of been paying £70 a week.
Does that mean even if he stops working now, he still owes me the arrears because they can prove he earnt in the time period?

Thanks for the advice, I'm off to look at the tax board to see why he is using the umbrella company! :rotfl:

well thats just the perfect little story isn't it. and i believe you...

please dont use your children for this, you will make them as bitter as you.

atwitsend_2

bungle4x4 wrote: »

well thats just the perfect little story isn't it. and i believe you...

please dont use your children for this, you will make them as bitter as you.

Yeah, I actually broke into his parents house and stole them from their doormat on seperate weeks to get the information :rolleyes::rotfl:

bungle4x4

'dont forget darhhhling, grab all the letters you can, and hide them in your change bag. and ill get you an ice cream/puppy/slap in the face if you dont do it'

bungle4x4

atwitsend_2

bungle4x4 wrote: »

'dont forget darhhhling, grab all the letters you can, and hide them in your change bag. and ill get you an ice cream/puppy/slap in the face if you dont do it'

She was 4 years old :rotfl: do you really think a 4 year old is capable of that :rotfl: Don't judge me by your own standards, thanks

custardy

DUTR wrote: »

As the letter was not addressed to the OP, then as I understand they are not able to act upon it's content to the detriment of the recipient
"A person commits an offence if, intending to act to a person's detriment and without reasonable excuse, opens a postal packet which they know or suspect to have been delivered incorrectly."

That is all sidetracking from the OP's query but does raise the quaetion to if the CSA can act upon the information contained , as they have to collate the information from the NRP.
PS I'm not in the legal profession btw.

i know we are veering off but the payslips in question have been delivered to the recipient
so they are not 'mail' at that point
its up to the recipient what they do with it after and safegaurd the contents