We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Contingent Building Indemnity Insurance policy, who pays for it: buyer or seller?

London_Buyer
Posts: 2 Newbie
Hi,
Does anyone know anything about contingent building indemnity insurance policies? Any info would be gladly appreciated.
My conveyancer tells me I need one because despite being share of freehold owners, my seller and the flat owner below individually insure their flats rather than share a joint policy. If the lower flat was destroyed and the owner's building insurance proved invalid, my flat would become worthless.
Furthermore, my conveyancer says the seller should pay for the policy. Whereas their solicitor argues that it's accepted practice when two flats don't share any common areas for the owners to be individually responsible for their flat insurance. Therefore if I want the policy I should pay for it.
Does anyone with experience of this situation know which solicitor is right?
Does anyone know anything about contingent building indemnity insurance policies? Any info would be gladly appreciated.
My conveyancer tells me I need one because despite being share of freehold owners, my seller and the flat owner below individually insure their flats rather than share a joint policy. If the lower flat was destroyed and the owner's building insurance proved invalid, my flat would become worthless.
Furthermore, my conveyancer says the seller should pay for the policy. Whereas their solicitor argues that it's accepted practice when two flats don't share any common areas for the owners to be individually responsible for their flat insurance. Therefore if I want the policy I should pay for it.
Does anyone with experience of this situation know which solicitor is right?
0
Comments
-
How strange, I have never heard of that before. Top flat is responsible for the roof?"A nation's greatness is measured by how it treats its weakest members." ~ Mahatma Gandhi
Ride hard or stay home :iloveyou:0 -
It depends a lot on what the leases say.
If they provide that the landlord is to insure the whole building but actually you have two separate policies then a policy is required because you are not complying with the lease terms.
If the lease actually says that the separate parts should be insured separately and the respective lessees are responsible for maintenance of their part of the building then I would say that this was acceptable without a policy. Anyway as part freeholder you can reasonably ask the other flat owner to provide evidence of his insuarcne form time to time.RICHARD WEBSTER
As a retired conveyancing solicitor I believe the information given in the post to be useful assuming any properties concerned are in England/Wales but I accept no liability for it.0 -
Thanks for the info. The lease states that the building should be insured by the freeholder, it says nothing about the two flats insuring themselves. It sounds like my conveyancer is right, and I have a strong case to demand the seller provides this indemnity policy.0
-
Hi,
I am also looking for some help with a very similar query so I hope someone can help.
The maisonette that I am selling is leasehold and I have been asked to provide such insurance by the buyer's conveyancer.
The lease makes no reference to the landlord insuring the building, and states that it is the 'purchasers' (leaseholders) responsibility to keep the property insured.
If my buyer wants extra insurance in case my neighbours don't insure then he should pay, to my layman's view of things anyway!
Any help kindly appreciated.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.4K Banking & Borrowing
- 252.9K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.3K Spending & Discounts
- 243.4K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.6K Life & Family
- 256.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards