We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Having 2 - 3 funds in same sector good or bad
sva19
Posts: 97 Forumite
When I choosing funds say for £1000, rather than having one fund in say China fund, I choose 2 or 3 funds, say Jupitor China, Gartmore [URL="javascript:openFactSheetsWindow('https://www.fidelity.co.uk/investor/research-funds/fund-supermarket/factsheet/summary.page?UseProxy=Yes&idtype=SEDOL&fundid=3387410&UserChannel=Direct&showwrapper=false');"][/URL]China and First State China, putting £333 equally.
The reason behind this is that one manager may perform better than other, but my question is is doing this Good or Bad, i.e am I just overlapping stock,
What your views?
Do others do this?
The reason behind this is that one manager may perform better than other, but my question is is doing this Good or Bad, i.e am I just overlapping stock,
What your views?
Do others do this?
0
Comments
-
Not all fund managers buy the same stock though.....

I have 2 global opp funds. 1 is up 8%, the other is up 19%.... (both bought at the same time)0 -
I'd suggest you'd be better off with one China fund, rather than 3. Perhaps go for one dedicated China fund, one emerging markets fund, and one, er, beer fund
Mmmm, credit crunch. Tasty.0 -
It depends on soooo many factors and your attitude / strategy. A lot of people will talk in terms of a balanced or diversified portfolio but that's because it suits their purpose / stage in life/investment/strategy........but my question is is doing this Good or Bad, i.e am I just overlapping stock,
What your views?
Do others do this?
I'm very much a resource based investor, and with it emerging economies and often hold two or three funds (for example) in the same geographical area or focus.
so to answer your question.......... "is it Good or Bad"....... well, it depends on you, are you ok with it?Personal Responsibility - Sad but True
Sometimes.... I am like a dog with a bone0 -
It's relatively easy to research Funds.
Having Funds with different mandates, strategies etc in the same geographical area makes sense.'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Good or bad ? Somewhere between good and irrelevant, but not bad0
-
I'm not sure I would opt for three funds in the same geographical area. Two perhaps, if they had different investment strategies but it rather depends which sectors the rest of your funds are invested in. If these are your only stock market investments I'd diversify elsewhere and only have a proportion of my portfolio in that region. If you're already adequate invested elsewhere, then such a belt & braces option may not be a bad alternative. As always, do your research. Hargreaves Lansdown, in the Funds Research section of their website give a list of the biggest holdings in each fund so you can check to see how much overlap there is.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards
