Landlords address?

N79

theartfullodger wrote: »

yes, but only for...
(Section 48 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987...
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1987/cukpga_19870031_en_10#pt6-l1g69
)

But for
(Note: Section 2 for "Bodies Corporate" not Section 1..

The addresses of all the directors are required so...


His address at the mansion in la Belle France is required....
see..
http://www.opsi.gov.uk/RevisedStatutes/Acts/ukpga/1985/cukpga_19850070_en_1#pb1-l1g2

Just as an aside, which may be relevent to the OP as the opening post is a little unclear, but a S2 can only be used if the LL is a corporate body, not just that that the LL's address is that of a corporate body where the LL conducts his business / owns but the actual LL is an individual.

My view is that if a LL's main occupation is a supermarket shelf stacker then S1 can be correctly complied with by providing the address of the supermarket in which he works. I can not find another interpretation of S38 of the 1985 LL and T act - but I would like to hear anyone else's opinion.

"“address” means a person’s place of abode or place of business or, in the case of a company, its registered office"

tbs624

N79 wrote: »

My view is that if a LL's main occupation is a supermarket shelf stacker then S1 can be correctly complied with by providing the address of the supermarket in which he works. I can not find another interpretation of S38 of the 1985 LL and T act - but I would like to hear anyone else's opinion.

"“address” means a person’s place of abode or place of business or, in the case of a company, its registered office"

Interesting view but I would argue that S38 of the statute speicfically uses the phrase "place of business" not "place of employment", which suggests that merely being an employee would not be sufficient.