We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Shareholder in BP or Shell?
FairPensions
Posts: 1 Newbie
Are you bothered by what Shell and now BP are getting up to in Canada? Oil Sands are neither environmentally nor socially sustainable but for investors the immediate question is whether sinking money into oil sands make good business sense in the short, medium or long term.
FairPensions is co-ordinating the tabling of resolutions (in-time for both companies' 2010 AGMs) calling on BP's and Shell's boards to furnish investors with a dedicated report on the costs and risks posed by oil sands and how these are being managed to protect investors' interests. To file the resolutions FairPensions is looking for shareholders of all sizes who'd like to see Shell and BP provide clear answers. If you have shares in either or both and would like to be amongst the 100 co-filers required, contact Louise Rouse (louise.rouse(at)fairpensions.org.uk or 020 7403 7800).
FairPensions is co-ordinating the tabling of resolutions (in-time for both companies' 2010 AGMs) calling on BP's and Shell's boards to furnish investors with a dedicated report on the costs and risks posed by oil sands and how these are being managed to protect investors' interests. To file the resolutions FairPensions is looking for shareholders of all sizes who'd like to see Shell and BP provide clear answers. If you have shares in either or both and would like to be amongst the 100 co-filers required, contact Louise Rouse (louise.rouse(at)fairpensions.org.uk or 020 7403 7800).
0
Comments
-
Are you bothered by what Shell and now BP are getting up to in Canada?
No.Oil Sands are neither environmentally nor socially sustainable
According to who ??'In nature, there are neither rewards nor punishments - there are Consequences.'0 -
Yawn :rolleyes::rolleyes:FairPensions wrote: »Are you bothered by what Shell and now BP are getting up to in Canada? Oil Sands are neither environmentally nor socially sustainable but for investors the immediate question is whether sinking money into oil sands make good business sense in the short, medium or long term.
FairPensions is co-ordinating the tabling of resolutions (in-time for both companies' 2010 AGMs) calling on BP's and Shell's boards to furnish investors with a dedicated report on the costs and risks posed by oil sands and how these are being managed to protect investors' interests. To file the resolutions FairPensions is looking for shareholders of all sizes who'd like to see Shell and BP provide clear answers. If you have shares in either or both and would like to be amongst the 100 co-filers required, contact Louise Rouse (louise.rouse(at)fairpensions.org.uk or 020 7403 7800).0 -
FairPensions wrote:
Are you bothered by what Shell and now BP are getting up to in Canada? Oil Sands are neither environmentally nor socially sustainable but for investors the immediate question is whether sinking money into oil sands make good business sense in the short, medium or long term.
I'm intensely bothered. For this reason, I'm not an investor in BP or Shell. I think that if you have a strong green agenda, you'd be better off avoiding oil companies altogether - perhaps choosing companies investing in green or renewable energy instead.
I don't think there can be many eco warriors with large holdings in BP, Shell, or any of the others!
Good luck with the activism, though.
For the avoidance of doubt: I work for an IFA.0 -
Spam button clicked.0
-
Myrmidon_J wrote: »...perhaps choosing companies investing in green or renewable energy instead.
BP did commit to investing $8billion on low carbon fuels by 2015, whether they do or not is another matter. How much do Greenpeace invest?
“I could see that, if not actually disgruntled, he was far from being gruntled.” - P.G. Wodehouse0 -
Good business sense? A single source, the Canadian tar sands, has proven reserves second in size only to Saudi Arabia. Wouldn't it be financially irresponsible not to investigate whether it can be extracted profitably?FairPensions wrote: »Are you bothered by what Shell and now BP are getting up to in Canada? Oil Sands are neither environmentally nor socially sustainable but for investors the immediate question is whether sinking money into oil sands make good business sense in the short, medium or long term.
As to the environment - there are at least 3 different extraction methods under development, some, such as ET-DSP, might be very clean if they work.
Besides, isn't removing tar from sand normally considered an environmentally good thing to do? That's what we are always told when spilt oil from tankers washes up on our shores!0 -
From 2012 Shell will be producing natural gas not oil in the majority, since lng is a much cleaner fuel it could be that they become the cleanest large energy producer in the world0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 355.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.8K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 456.1K Spending & Discounts
- 248.2K Work, Benefits & Business
- 605.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 179K Life & Family
- 263.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards

